17Dec20rv1_8_0+0302-c2be37945a - detailed test results for TOOLS

To reconnect the TextTest GUI to these results, run:

texttest -a tools -d /home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/clangDebug/texttesttmp/clang3_64D.31Dec031034.1832 -g

To start TextTest for these tests, run:

texttest -a tools -d /home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/tests


default: 625 tests: 528 succeeded 81 FAILED 12 killed 4 known bugs

Detailed information for the tests that FAILED:

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign costFunctionChecker flow ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua-log.txt for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,350d2
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router with input_flows_0.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router with input_flows_1.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router with input_flows_2.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router with input_flows_3.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

3 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua-log.txt for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,350d2
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router with input_trips_0.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router with input_trips_1.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router with input_trips_2.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router with input_trips_3.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
assign costFunctionChecker identity ( Last six runs Dec2020 )
assign costFunctionChecker simple ( Last six runs Dec2020 )
assign costFunctionChecker three ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate binary ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.gz
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.gz
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.gz
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.gz
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate convergence ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,186d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,88d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 1 steps: 0.00000
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 2 steps: 0.00795
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 3 steps: 0.00752
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 4 steps: 0.00692
< ------------------
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate external_gawron ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
4,114d3
< <<
< basename input_trips
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 4 edges
< >>> Decayed 0 unseen edges
< >>> Error avg:0 mean:0
< >>> Absolute Error avg:0 mean:0
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< basename input_trips
< step: 1
< get externalgawron
< run getRouteChoices
< ecoMeasure: None
< prefix: input_trips_001
< parse network file
< could not parse weights file: None
< parse dumpfile
< 0/dump_000_900.xml
< parse routeAltfile: 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< parse routeAltfile from externalGawron:  input_trips_000.rou.galt.xml
< new probability for route 1 for veh 0
< new probability for route 3 for veh 1
< new probability for route 5 for veh 2
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate filtered_tripinfo ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<tripinfos>
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="0" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="1" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="2" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="3" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="4" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="6" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="5" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="7" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="8" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="9" />
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate intermodal ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,107d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 3468.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 16
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< Persons: 
<  Inserted: 4
<  Running: 0
< 
< DijkstraRouter answered 7 queries and explored 16.71 edges on average.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Warning: Vehicle 'p0_0' aborted waiting for a person or container that will never come.
< Simulation ended at time: 3467.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="bus.0" depart="0.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="167.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.48" duration="167.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="29.00" timeLoss="40.81" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.0" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.1" depart="300.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="466.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="5.56" duration="166.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="5.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="28.00" timeLoss="40.82" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.1 person_bus.1" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <personinfo id="p0" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <walk depart="0.00" departPos="0.00" arrival="301.00" arrivalPos="98.10" duration="301.00" routeLength="385.04" timeLoss="31.93" maxSpeed="1.43"/>
        <ride waitingTime="84.00" vehicle="bus.1" depart="385.00" arrival="428.00" arrivalPos="59.97" duration="43.00" routeLength="214.40" timeLoss="12.38"/>
        <walk depart="428.00" departPos="59.97" arrival="491.00" arrivalPos="140.00" duration="63.00" routeLength="80.03" timeLoss="7.08" maxSpeed="1.43"/>
    </personinfo>
    <personinfo id="p2" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <walk depart="0.00" departPos="0.00" arrival="302.00" arrivalPos="98.10" duration="302.00" routeLength="385.04" timeLoss="36.91" maxSpeed="1.45"/>
        <ride waitingTime="83.00" vehicle="bus.1" depart="385.00" arrival="428.00" arrivalPos="59.97" duration="43.00" routeLength="214.40" timeLoss="12.38"/>
        <walk depart="428.00" departPos="59.97" arrival="492.00" arrivalPos="140.00" duration="64.00" routeLength="80.03" timeLoss="8.91" maxSpeed="1.45"/>
    </personinfo>
    <tripinfo id="v0" depart="0.00" departLane="e2_3" departPos="0.00" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="556.00" arrivalLane="e2_3" arrivalPos="120.00" arrivalSpeed="12.96" duration="556.00" routeLength="120.00" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="538.00" timeLoss="9.07" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_v0" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="v1" depart="2.00" departLane="e2_3" departPos="0.00" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="2.00" arrival="556.00" arrivalLane="e2_4" arrivalPos="120.00" arrivalSpeed="12.26" duration="554.00" routeLength="120.00" waitingTime="1.00" waitingCount="1" stopTime="536.00" timeLoss="10.00" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_v1" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <personinfo id="p1" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <ride waitingTime="0.00" vehicle="p1_0" depart="0.00" arrival="591.00" arrivalPos="145.03" duration="591.00" routeLength="644.89" timeLoss="541.14"/>
    </personinfo>
    <tripinfo id="p1_0" depart="0.00" departLane="begin_3" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="591.00" arrivalLane="end_3" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="12.11" duration="591.00" routeLength="644.89" waitingTime="530.00" waitingCount="1" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="541.14" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_p1_0 person_p1_0" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <personinfo id="p3" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <walk depart="0.00" departPos="0.00" arrival="607.00" arrivalPos="140.00" duration="607.00" routeLength="645.11" timeLoss="82.76" maxSpeed="1.23"/>
    </personinfo>
    <tripinfo id="bus.2" depart="600.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="767.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="5.65" duration="167.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="3.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="30.00" timeLoss="39.89" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.2" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.3" depart="900.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1065.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.18" duration="165.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="2.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="29.00" timeLoss="39.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.3" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.4" depart="1200.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1368.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.12" duration="168.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="3.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="23.00" timeLoss="47.73" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.4" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.5" depart="1500.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1666.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.51" duration="166.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="2.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="28.00" timeLoss="41.21" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.5" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.6" depart="1800.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1967.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.77" duration="167.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="1.00" waitingCount="1" stopTime="21.00" timeLoss="48.38" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.6" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate mapmatchJunctions ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
2c2
< '-c', 'iteration_000_input_trips.duarcfg']
---
> '-c', '0/iteration_000_input_trips.duarcfg']
5,16d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', 'iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 177.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
18,33c6,7
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', 'iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', 'iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 177.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< Loading configuration ... done.
4,40d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< Loading configuration ... done.
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< Loading configuration ... done.
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< Loading configuration ... done.
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="70.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.73" duration="70.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="89.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="13.04" duration="79.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="94.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.04" duration="74.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.22" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="99.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="15.05" duration="69.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.41" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="112.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.32" duration="72.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.28" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="138.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="11.55" duration="88.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="1.75" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="140.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.54" duration="80.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="10.80" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="153.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="12.32" duration="83.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="1.89" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="159.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="13.04" duration="79.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="176.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="11.91" duration="86.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="1.82" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate recognize_error ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
8a9,37
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24768==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bb930  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bb930)
>     #1 0x7f3aa351f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bb930  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bb930)
>     #1 0x7f3aa351f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bb930  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bb930)
>     #1 0x7f3aa351f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3aa35dfe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bb930  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bb930)
>     #1 0x7f3aa351f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3aa35e36f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bb930  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bb930)
>     #1 0x7f3aa351f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x343b3150b2a9a2ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

2 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>
assign dua-iterate simple ( Last six runs Dec2020 )
assign dua-iterate unordered_input ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate start_with_routes ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 252.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_routes_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 249.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_routes_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_routes_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_routes_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_routes_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="129.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.49" duration="129.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.70" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="144.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="156.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.52" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.23" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="158.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.97" duration="138.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="13.65" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="173.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="27.59" duration="133.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.73" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="191.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.70" duration="131.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.53" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="217.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="22.81" duration="167.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="15.05" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="225.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="25.11" duration="145.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="10.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="226.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.29" duration="156.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="14.49" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="248.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.77" duration="158.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="10.23" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate vtypes_add ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate weight_memory ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,60d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 4 edges
< >>> Decayed 0 unseen edges
< >>> Error avg:0 mean:0
< >>> Absolute Error avg:0 mean:0
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 7 edges
< >>> Decayed 0 unseen edges
< >>> Error avg:0.148571428571 mean:0
< >>> Absolute Error avg:0.202857142857 mean:0.02
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 7 edges
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign one-shot simple ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2,12d1
< ------------------
< 
< > Running simulation with update frequency 1800
< ------------------
< 
< > Running simulation with update frequency 300
< ------------------
< 
< > Running simulation with update frequency 15
< ------------------
< 

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle complex ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,8
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:33:5: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:34:5: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:35:5: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:36:5: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:37:5: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:38:5: E124 closing bracket does not match visual indentation
> traci/simulation/collisions/runner.py:54:1: W391 blank line at end of file
> traci/vehicle/moveToXY/speedWithoutTraCI/runner.py:72:9: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : import OSM build_passenger ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
11a12,68
> 
> =================================================================
> ==28212==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff34d7446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff34d7446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 1120 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #14 0x7ff34bdd3bf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff34d7446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff34d8086f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff34d7446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff34d804e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 648 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7ff34bdd3bf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Indirect leak of 432 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
>     #15 0x7ff34bdd3bf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Indirect leak of 192 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : import OSM taxiStop ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
60a61,84
> 
> =================================================================
> ==28184==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2a012d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2a012d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2a012d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f2a01397e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2a012d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f2a0139b6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2a012d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x115eb253408bdff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : import OSM webWizard ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
132a133,213
> 
> =================================================================
> ==28938==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 736 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7f7e2ec29bf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7e3059a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7e3059a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 38192 byte(s) in 434 object(s) allocated from:
>     #10 0x7f7e305e3b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 23280 byte(s) in 434 object(s) allocated from:
>     #9 0x7f7e305e3b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 14592 byte(s) in 17 object(s) allocated from:
>     #9 0x7f7e305e3b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 5712 byte(s) in 17 object(s) allocated from:
>     #3 0x7f7e305e3b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 3648 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from:
>     #4 0x7f7e305e4377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Indirect leak of 2760 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
136,183d135
< Success.
< Success.
< Success.
< Success.
< Success.
< Success.
< Success.
< Written configuration to <PATH>
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading net-file from <DIR>/osm.net.xml' ... done ((TIME)).
< Loading additional-files from <DIR>/osm.poly.xml' ... done ((TIME)).
< Loading additional-files from <DIR>/osm_stops.add.xml' ... done ((TIME)).
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 2736.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 434
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< Teleports: 2 (Collisions: 2)
< Persons: 
<  Inserted: 199
<  Running: 0
< Statistics (avg):
<  RouteLength: 1834.00
<  Speed: 6.09
<  Duration: 333.59
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in osmbatch ----------
python /path/to/ptlines2flows.py" -n osm.net.xml -e 900 -p 600 --random-begin --seed 42 --ptstops osm_stops.add.xml --ptlines osm_ptlines.xml -o osm_pt.rou.xml --ignore-errors --vtype-prefix pt_ --stopinfos-file stopinfos.xml --routes-file vehroutes.xml --trips-file trips.trips.xml --min-stops 0 --extend-to-fringe --verbose
python /path/to/randomTrips.py -n osm.net.xml --fringe-factor 1 -p 4.424176 -o osm.pedestrian.trips.xml -e 900 -r osm.pedestrian.rou.xml --vehicle-class pedestrian --persontrips --prefix ped --trip-attributes <attrs-with-os-dependent-quoting> --additional-files osm_stops.add.xml,osm_pt.rou.xml
python /path/to/randomTrips.py -n osm.net.xml --fringe-factor 2 -p 10.666056 -o osm.bicycle.trips.xml -e 900 --vehicle-class bicycle --vclass bicycle --prefix bike --fringe-start-attributes <attrs-with-os-dependent-quoting> --validate
python /path/to/randomTrips.py -n osm.net.xml --fringe-factor 5 -p 4.148811 -o osm.passenger.trips.xml -e 900 --vehicle-class passenger --vclass passenger --prefix veh --min-distance 300 --trip-attributes <attrs-with-os-dependent-quoting> --validate
python /path/to/randomTrips.py -n osm.net.xml --fringe-factor 40 -p 201.616855 -o osm.ship.trips.xml -e 900 --vehicle-class ship --vclass ship --prefix ship --validate --fringe-start-attributes "departSpeed=\"max\""
---------- Missing result in osmtrips ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<routes xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/routes_file.xsd">
    <vType id="ped_pedestrian" vClass="pedestrian"/>
    <person id="ped0" depart="0.00" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="335704572" to="-156364570#0" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped1" depart="4.42" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="168942727#1" to="131611527#2" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped2" depart="8.85" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="388702041#3" to="346229515#2" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped3" depart="13.27" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="51167562#0" to="-305153173" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped4" depart="17.70" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="24243052#3" to="-165415464#1" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped5" depart="22.12" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="121717657#4" to="272757348#0" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped6" depart="26.54" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="-15971189" to="104786912#0" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped7" depart="30.97" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="340498976#8" to="274524371" modes="public"/>
    </person>
    <person id="ped8" depart="35.39" type="ped_pedestrian">
        <personTrip from="125513277" to="31112516#2" modes="public"/>
    </person>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff change_to_unwritten_default ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22894==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fda334a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fda334a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fda334a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fda33564e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fda334a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fda335686f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fda334a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x314350992ec118ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22902==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff copy_location ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22897==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f23b5bd96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f23b5bd96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f23b5bd96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f23b5c99e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f23b5bd96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f23b5c9d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f23b5bd96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xb2361700e518c8ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22905==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff crossing ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22917==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1cc219b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1cc219b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1cc219b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1cc225be1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1cc219b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1cc225f6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1cc219b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd168c6d5ed01fbff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22923==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff delete_dead_end_edge ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,49
> 
> =================================================================
> ==23108==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f56a1abb6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f56a1abb6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f56a1abb6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f56a1b7be1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f56a1abb6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f56a1b7f6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f56a1abb6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x66ee9661131c4cff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==23121==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff invalidated_neigh ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==23106==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f03b09d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f03b09d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f03b09d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f03b0a97e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f03b09d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f03b0a9b6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f03b09d76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x18ff91c555418aff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==23122==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff join_junctions ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22893==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa42255f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa42255f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa42255f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa42261fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa42255f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa4226236f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa42255f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x12ababb3e36316ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22903==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff patch_on_import ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22895==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb525eb26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb525eb26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb525eb26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb525f72e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb525eb26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb525f766f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb525eb26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x487b5618a38c5eff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22907==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff roundabout ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22896==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f91a8c5b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f91a8c5b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f91a8c5b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f91a8d1be1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f91a8c5b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f91a8d1f6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f91a8c5b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf1f54a3786db5bff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22906==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff split_edge ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22970==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f19c74196c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f19c74196c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f19c74196c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f19c74d9e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f19c74196c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f19c74dd6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f19c74196c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xae2c087e0b5af2ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==22972==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport generateRailSignalConstraints one_switch trip_input ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==696==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f82a149f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f82a149f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f82a149f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f82a155fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f82a149f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f82a15636f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f82a149f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x39415d3d590313ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows basic ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==589==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5e1995f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5e1995f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5e1995f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5e19a1fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5e1995f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5e19a236f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5e1995f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x2d5eaac43edd72ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows begin_end ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==594==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa91d39f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa91d39f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa91d39f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa91d45fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa91d39f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa91d4636f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa91d39f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd9679b7037cc2dff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows extendFringe ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,25
> 
> =================================================================
> ==643==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2c1a2656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2c1a2656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2c1a2656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f2c1a325e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2c1a2656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f2c1a3296f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2c1a2656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xa762635114ece9ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows few_stops ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
3a4,27
> 
> =================================================================
> ==655==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa8d15b96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa8d15b96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa8d15b96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa8d1679e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa8d15b96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa8d167d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa8d15b96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x52b79eae75144eff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows hrtime ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==591==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f86ae7376c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f86ae7376c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f86ae7376c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f86ae7f7e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f86ae7376c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f86ae7fb6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f86ae7376c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xa92a1e88c647cfff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows name_missing ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==653==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08028046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08028046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08028046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f08028c4e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08028046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f08028c86f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08028046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xff3cfb10662b32ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows night ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==635==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13fda6d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13fda6d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13fda6d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f13fdb2de1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13fda6d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f13fdb316f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13fda6d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7353727f607ca4ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows parking ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==590==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f14c4e306c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f14c4e306c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f14c4e306c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f14c4ef0e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f14c4e306c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f14c4ef46f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f14c4e306c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xba83685dfa91adff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows pt_routes_from_ptlines_file ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==595==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feffdc656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feffdc656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feffdc656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7feffdd25e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feffdc656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7feffdd296f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feffdc656c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd71225d1fe9bf6ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows random_begin ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==593==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff0d84226c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff0d84226c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff0d84226c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff0d84e2e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff0d84226c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff0d84e66f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff0d84226c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd19e9978005096ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows reverse_at_stop ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,64
> 
> =================================================================
> ==677==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 368 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #12 0x7fb88d7dfbf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8911236c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8911236c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 6256 byte(s) in 17 object(s) allocated from:
>     #12 0x7fb88d7dfbf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8911236c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb8911e3e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8911236c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb8911e76f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 576 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #20 0x7fb88d7dfbf6  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21bf6)
> 
> Indirect leak of 368 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows stop_duration ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==592==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc3d6d7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc3d6d7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc3d6d7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc3d6e3ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc3d6d7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc3d6e426f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc3d6d7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x773df69ca5556ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows types ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==588==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7fc3d786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7fc3d786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7fc3d786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7fc3e38e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7fc3d786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7fc3e3c6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7fc3d786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x644c828e834c6aff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes default ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24381==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1a7eeec6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1a7eeec6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1a7eeec6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1a7eface1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1a7eeec6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1a7efb06f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1a7eeec6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd288ca7b4e5a93ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes edge_loop ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24444==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5c4b76a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5c4b76a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5c4b76a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5c4b82ae1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5c4b76a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5c4b82e6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5c4b76a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xff23b6a8bd0ec9ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes internal ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24484==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79517d16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79517d16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79517d16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7951891e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79517d16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f79518956f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79517d16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x8c020e7a5e434fff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes min-air-dist ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24382==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17d1e346c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17d1e346c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17d1e346c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f17d1ef4e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17d1e346c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f17d1ef86f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17d1e346c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x24bec76ce2f7bbff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes min-dist ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24379==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3d7dc26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3d7dc26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3d7dc26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff3d7e82e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3d7dc26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff3d7e866f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3d7dc26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x9b432a8d861f40ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes node_loop ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24424==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7a46d2d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7a46d2d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7a46d2d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7a46dede1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7a46d2d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7a46df16f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7a46d2d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x4f0ae42ad3fcb6ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes restriction-output ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24380==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9df26d66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9df26d66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9df26d66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f9df2796e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9df26d66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f9df279a6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9df26d66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd546a3496eddcff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes standalone ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==24383==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f389ecbf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f389ecbf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f389ecbf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f389ed7fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f389ecbf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f389ed836f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f389ecbf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd3162f208a8298ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : sumolib patch_network ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==488==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd0119ae6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd0119ae6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd0119ae6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd011a6ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd0119ae6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd011a726f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd0119ae6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x8951413351c95cff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
1a26,49
> 
> =================================================================
> ==490==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in net ----------
4c4
< <net version="1.6" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
---
> <net version="1.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
---------- Differences in nodes ----------
1c1
< <nodes version="1.6">
---
> <nodes version="1.9">

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : sumolib sumolib3d ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==492==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7efcfd4a76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7efcfd4a76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7efcfd4a76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7efcfd567e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7efcfd4a76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7efcfd56b6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7efcfd4a76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xc948cc14710afdff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 1flow ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27127==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13f48a06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13f48a06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13f48a06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f13f4960e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13f48a06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f13f49646f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13f48a06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xab9a2b25c34415ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 2tls ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27120==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37478bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37478bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37478bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f374797fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37478bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f37479836f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37478bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x95a1694ffec34aff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 2tls_add ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27125==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f770a21c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f770a21c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f770a21c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f770a2dce1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f770a21c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f770a2e06f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f770a21c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xdc82fb43c1ce7ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 2tls_intermediate_node ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27124==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6d146046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6d146046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6d146046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f6d146c4e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6d146046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f6d146c86f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6d146046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf60a58dae3c456ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 3flows ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27123==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f370ce9f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f370ce9f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f370ce9f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f370cf5fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f370ce9f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f370cf636f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f370ce9f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x35403f01c960d3ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 4flows ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27126==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4f877566c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4f877566c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4f877566c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f4f87816e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4f877566c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f4f8781a6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4f877566c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x389afcf3bfb52fff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 4flows_b ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27122==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51894846c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51894846c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51894846c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5189544e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51894846c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f51895486f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51894846c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x4c11ac4b3f9b94ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator basic ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27128==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f8d0ddc76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f8d0ddc76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f8d0ddc76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f8d0de87e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f8d0ddc76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f8d0de8b6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f8d0ddc76c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x2b9d3e9002053bff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips duarouter_options ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27447==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fbef6bf66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fbef6bf66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fbef6bf66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fbef6cb6e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fbef6bf66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fbef6cba6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fbef6bf66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x139457a912d8d9ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips junctionTaz ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27476==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37573716c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37573716c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37573716c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3757431e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37573716c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f37574356f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f37573716c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xbfc5bb0280abc2ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips junctionTaz_flow ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27475==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7facc8c996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7facc8c996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7facc8c996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7facc8d59e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7facc8c996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7facc8d5d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7facc8c996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xb5e12d837d91dbff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips junctionTaz_validate ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27472==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2cadcfd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2cadcfd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2cadcfd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f2caddbde1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2cadcfd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f2caddc16f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f2cadcfd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x600e5d343d78ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27497==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips persontrips ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,30
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27323==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 56800 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7f9816af2377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9816aa86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9816aa86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 13600 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7f9816af2377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9816aa86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f9816b68e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9816aa86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f9816b6c6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f9816aa86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x18a9ffbfbab765ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips persontrips_junctionTaz ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,30
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27399==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 56800 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7feb4f7c2377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feb4f7786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feb4f7786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 13600 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7feb4f7c2377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feb4f7786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7feb4f838e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feb4f7786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7feb4f83c6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7feb4f7786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf056ebbb4ed36eff  (<unknown module>)
> 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips validate ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27344==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdf768576c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdf768576c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdf768576c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fdf76917e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdf768576c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fdf7691b6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdf768576c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x19dc67650dbbfbff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27382==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips validate_intermediate ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27392==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f87740996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f87740996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f87740996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f8774159e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f87740996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f877415d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f87740996c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xfd292426eeb705ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27416==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips vclass_additional_file ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27248==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f49771436c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f49771436c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f49771436c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f4977203e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f49771436c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f49772076f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f49771436c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd2cace42067d7aff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips vtype_additional_file_validate ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27432==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79c19b06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79c19b06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79c19b06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f79c1a70e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79c19b06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f79c1a746f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f79c19b06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x42e6b1950cebcfff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==27436==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter attrs ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==29959==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa78386d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa78386d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa78386d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa78392de1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa78386d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa7839316f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa78386d6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x1cc862ee5f725cff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter default ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==29958==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f74cc4446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f74cc4446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f74cc4446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f74cc504e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f74cc4446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f74cc5086f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f74cc4446c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd8994a0ec2d8b3ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter discount-sources ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==29960==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7f4073a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7f4073a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7f4073a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7f407fae1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7f4073a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7f407fe6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7f4073a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xdc23e639771d04ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter fringe_flows ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==29961==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c2d6506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60056 byte(s) in 396 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c2d6506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c2d6506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7c2d710e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c2d6506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7c2d7146f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c2d6506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x5a47823da203f7ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62312 byte(s) leaked in 416 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler optimize_1 ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2c2
< Wrote 98 routes (96 distinct) achieving total count 751 (100.00%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 100.00%
---
> Wrote 98 routes (98 distinct) achieving total count 751 (100.00%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 100.00%
---------- Differences in routes ----------
113c113
<         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
209c209
<         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler optimize_2 ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in routes ----------
8c8
<         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
113c113
<         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
182c182
<         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
209c209
<         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler optimize_few_detectors ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in routes ----------
5,6c5,6
<     <route id="13" edges="-43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 -60 -60.80.00"/> <!-- 60 -->
<     <route id="17" edges="-68 -43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60"/> <!-- 80 -->
---
>     <route id="13" edges="-43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 -60 -60.80.00"/> <!-- 73 -->
>     <route id="17" edges="-68 -43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60"/> <!-- 67 -->
8,9c8,9
<     <flow id="13" begin="0.00" end="98.51" number="60" route="13"/>
<     <flow id="17" begin="0.49" end="97.02" number="80" route="17"/>
---
>     <flow id="13" begin="0.00" end="98.51" number="73" route="13"/>
>     <flow id="17" begin="0.49" end="97.02" number="67" route="17"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler small_input_noSampling_optimize ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2,3c2,3
< Wrote 53 routes (29 distinct) achieving total count 440 (58.59%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 44.93%
< Warning: underflow locations: count 98, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 14.00 (('23', '23.80.00')), mean 3.24 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 4.00 (total 318)
---
> Wrote 53 routes (29 distinct) achieving total count 440 (58.59%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 46.38%
> Warning: underflow locations: count 98, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 15.00 (('11', '11.80.00')), mean 3.24 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 3.00 (total 318)
---------- Differences in routes ----------
5c5
<         <route edges="-79 -79.80.00 75 75.121.42 120 120.180.00 -120 -120.180.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="-60 -60.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00"/>
8c8
<         <route edges="-27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 75 75.121.42"/>
---
>         <route edges="-27 -27.80.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
11c11
<         <route edges="109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 5"/>
---
>         <route edges="-92.180.00 -60 -60.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00"/>
14c14
<         <route edges="-27 -27.80.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="-15 -15.180.00 15 15.180.00"/>
20c20
<         <route edges="123 123.121.42 -123 -123.121.42 -109 -109.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 64 64.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 5"/>
23c23
<         <route edges="-37 -37.80.00 31 31.80.00 64 64.80.00 -64"/>
---
>         <route edges="-37 -37.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 109 109.80.00 131 131.180.00"/>
26c26
<         <route edges="27 27.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 15 15.180.00 -144 -144.121.42 -131"/>
---
>         <route edges="15 15.180.00 -123 -123.121.42 -120 -120.180.00 -75 -75.121.42 -60"/>
29c29
<         <route edges="15 15.180.00 -123 -123.121.42 -120 -120.180.00 -75 -75.121.42 -60"/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler small_input_optimize ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2,3c2,3
< Wrote 53 routes (28 distinct) achieving total count 442 (58.85%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 43.48%
< Warning: underflow locations: count 97, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 14.00 (('23', '23.80.00')), mean 3.26 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 4.00 (total 316)
---
> Wrote 52 routes (28 distinct) achieving total count 442 (58.85%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 44.20%
> Warning: underflow locations: count 98, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 15.00 (('11', '11.80.00')), mean 3.22 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 4.00 (total 316)
---------- Differences in routes ----------
5,7d4
<         <route edges="43 68 -45 -45.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 27 27.80.00 45"/>
<     </vehicle>
<     <vehicle id="1" depart="1.87">
10,14c7,8
<     <vehicle id="2" depart="3.74">
<         <route edges="-27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 75 75.121.42"/>
<     </vehicle>
<     <vehicle id="3" depart="5.60">
<         <route edges="-3.180.00 11 11.80.00 109 109.80.00 123"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="1" depart="1.90">
>         <route edges="-60 -60.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00"/>
16,17c10,11
<     <vehicle id="4" depart="7.47">
<         <route edges="-131 -131.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45 -45.80.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="2" depart="3.81">
>         <route edges="31.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 -27 -27.80.00"/>
19,20c13,14
<     <vehicle id="5" depart="9.34">
<         <route edges="144 144.121.42 -15 -15.180.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="3" depart="5.71">
>         <route edges="-131 -131.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27"/>
22,23c16,17
<     <vehicle id="6" depart="11.21">
<         <route edges="3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="4" depart="7.62">
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

Detailed information for the tests that had known bugs:

TEST had known bugs (see #5409) on ts-sim-build-ba : detector flowrouter motorway_ramps lane_based ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

option lane-based does not work
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'routes' matching 'on3 3 off3')
---------- Differences in flows ----------
2c2,3
<     <flow id="1_off3.qPKW" departSpeed="max" departPos="last" departLane="best" route="1_off3.qPKW" number="450" begin="0" end="3600"/>
---
>     <flow id="1_0_9_0.qPKW" departSpeed="max" departPos="last" departLane="best" route="1_0_9_0.qPKW" number="450" begin="0" end="3600"/>
>     <flow id="on3_0_off3_0.qPKW" departSpeed="max" departPos="last" departLane="best" route="on3_0_off3_0.qPKW" number="450" begin="0" end="3600"/>
---------- Differences in routes ----------
2c2,3
<     <route id="1_off3.qPKW" edges="1 2 3 off3"/>
---
>     <route id="1_0_9_0.qPKW" edges="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9"/>
>     <route id="on3_0_off3_0.qPKW" edges="on3 3 off3"/>

TEST had known bugs (see #2620) on ts-sim-build-ba : projects evacuation plain ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

unstable inputs
(This bug was triggered by text found in the full difference report matching 'Warning')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,6925d0
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'waterway.canal' (first occurence for edge '4041237#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4045243#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4068019#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4068043#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4068192').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.tertiary' (first occurence for edge '4377008#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.tertiary' (first occurence for edge '4377122#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.share_busway' in type 'cycleway.share_busway|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4377785#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4383334').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'highway.construction' (first occurence for edge '4391568').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4395586#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.share_busway' in type 'cycleway.share_busway|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4395950#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite' in type 'cycleway.opposite|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4396234').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.living_street' (first occurence for edge '4410583').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.secondary_link' (first occurence for edge '4484071').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.cycleway' (first occurence for edge '4492364#0').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'railway.disused' (first occurence for edge '4525886').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'highway.proposed' (first occurence for edge '4611776#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.none' in type 'cycleway.none|highway.tertiary' (first occurence for edge '4612758#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4615457#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4615457#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.shared' in type 'cycleway.shared|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4615594#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite' in type 'cycleway.opposite|highway.living_street' (first occurence for edge '4639037#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite_track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4686018#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4686018#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4686018#0').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'waterway.riverbank' (first occurence for edge '4686373#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.shared_lane' in type 'cycleway.shared_lane|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4790833#0').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'railway.abandoned' (first occurence for edge '4790904').
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
1,97d0
< Parsing types from <DIR>/osmNetconvert.typ.xml'... done.
< Parsing nodes from osm-file 'osm_bbox.osm.xml'... 
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 3215103784 with 288002013
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 3987794203 with 3987794202
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 3997661445 with 3517810193
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 4016273048 with 26992494
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 4016273049 with 2306772973
< done.
< Parsing edges from osm-file 'osm_bbox.osm.xml'... done.
< Removing duplicate edges... 
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 310058575
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 310058576
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 310058577
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 335703516
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 335703519
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 335703532
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 377118659
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 377494320
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 391385403
< done.
< Adding new type 'highway.service|railway.tram' (first occurence for edge '167272531#0').
< Parsing relations from osm-file 'osm_bbox.osm.xml'... 
< done.
<  Removed 1494 traffic lights before loading plain-XML
<  Import done:
<    37203 nodes loaded.
<    34 types loaded.
<    36921 edges loaded.
< Proj projection parameters used: '+proj=utm +zone=33 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs'.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- New result in catalogue ----------
No files or directories were created, edited or deleted.

TEST had known bugs (see #7446) on ts-sim-build-ba : route cut_routes pt person ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

rides without from are not cut
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'trips' matching 'ride_off_nofrom')
---------- Differences in trips ----------
8a9,11
>     <person depart="0.00" id="ride_off_nofrom">
>         <ride from="53356539#0" lines="140:1" to="4710636#2"/>
>     </person>

TEST had known bugs (see #5588) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml csv2xml meandata_edges_utf8 ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

python2 csv reader cannot handle utf8
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching 'UnicodeEncodeError')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,5
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>     main()
>     writeHierarchicalXml(xsd.XsdStructure(options.xsd), options)
>     for raw in csv.reader(inputf, delimiter=options.delimiter):
> UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe4' in position 25: ordinal not in range(128)
---------- Differences in xml ----------
1,16c1
< <meandata>
<     <interval begin="0.00" end="60.00" id="dump_60">
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="รค" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="1o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="1si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="2fi" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="2o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="2si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="3fi" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="3o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="3si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="4fi" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="4o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="4si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<     </interval>
< </meandata>
---
> <meandata
\ Kein Zeilenumbruch am Dateiende.

Detailed information for the tests that were terminated before completion:

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle header ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in output ----------
1,18d0
< docs/web/theme/__init__.py is empty
< src/foreign/eulerspiral/odrSpiral.cpp header does not start
< src/foreign/eulerspiral/odrSpiral.h header does not start
< src/foreign/fmi/fmi2FunctionTypes.h header does not start
< src/foreign/fmi/fmi2Functions.h header does not start
< src/foreign/fmi/fmi2TypesPlatform.h header does not start
< src/foreign/fontstash/fontstash.h header does not start
< src/foreign/fontstash/glfontstash.h header does not start
< src/foreign/fontstash/stb_truetype.h header does not start
< src/foreign/rtree/RTree.h header does not start
< src/foreign/tcpip/socket.cpp header does not start
< src/foreign/tcpip/socket.h header does not start
< src/foreign/tcpip/storage.cpp header does not start
< src/foreign/tcpip/storage.h header does not start
< tools/webWizard/SimpleWebSocketServer.py different license:
< # Eclipse SUMO, Simulation of Urban MObility; see https://eclipse.org/sumo
< # The MIT License (MIT) Copyright (c) 2013 Dave P.
< 

3 TESTS were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba :

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
build checkStyle netedit ( Last six runs Dec2020 )
build checkStyle netedit_additionals ( Last six runs Dec2020 )
build checkStyle netedit_demand ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle tools ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in output ----------
1,4c1,2
< webWizard/SimpleWebSocketServer.py different license:
< # Eclipse SUMO, Simulation of Urban MObility; see https://eclipse.org/sumo
< # The MIT License (MIT) Copyright (c) 2013 Dave P.
< 
---
> build/dailyNetedit.py:64:121: E501 line too long (131 > 120 characters)
> build/wix.py:81:121: E501 line too long (125 > 120 characters)

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests additional ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in errors ----------
5,22d4
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/friendlypos/input_additionals.add.xml:8:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'access', attribute 'friendlyPos': 'dummyFriendlyPos' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'boolType'.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/friendlypos/input_additionals.add.xml:8:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_ENUMERATION_VALID: Element 'access', attribute 'friendlyPos': [facet 'enumeration'] The value 'dummyFriendlyPos' is not an element of the set {'true', 'false', 'True', 'False', 'yes', 'no', 'on', 'off', '1', '0', 'x', '-'}.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/invalid_parent/input_additionals.add.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'busStop': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/lane/input_additionals.add.xml:5:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'access': The attribute 'lane' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/length/input_additionals.add.xml:11:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'access', attribute 'length': '-30' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'nonNegativeFloatType'.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/length/input_additionals.add.xml:11:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_MININCLUSIVE_VALID: Element 'access', attribute 'length': [facet 'minInclusive'] The value '-30' is less than the minimum value allowed ('0').
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/length/input_additionals.add.xml:8:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'access', attribute 'length': 'dummyLenght' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'nonNegativeFloatType'.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/no_parent/input_additionals.add.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_ELEMENT_CONTENT: Element 'access': This element is not expected.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/parameters/input_additionals.add.xml:18:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'param': The attribute 'value' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/parameters/input_additionals.add.xml:27:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'param': The attribute 'key' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/parameters/input_additionals.add.xml:27:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'param': The attribute 'value' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/parameters/input_additionals.add.xml:9:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'param': The attribute 'key' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/pos/input_additionals.add.xml:5:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'access', attribute 'pos': 'dummyPosition' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/access/load/pos/input_additionals.add.xml:8:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'access', attribute 'pos': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/basic/relative_positions/input_additionals.add.xml:13:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_3_2_1: Element 'instantInductionLoop', attribute 'freq': The attribute 'freq' is not allowed.
< netedit/additionalElements/basic/relative_positions/input_additionals.add.xml:14:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_3_2_1: Element 'rerouter', attribute 'off': The attribute 'off' is not allowed.
< netedit/additionalElements/basic/relative_positions/input_additionals.add.xml:16:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_3_2_1: Element 'vaporizer', attribute 'edge': The attribute 'edge' is not allowed.
< netedit/additionalElements/basic/relative_positions/input_additionals.add.xml:16:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'vaporizer': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
159,200d140
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/chargedelay/input_additionals.add.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'chargeDelay': 'dummyCharge' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/chargeintransit/input_additionals.add.xml:13:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'chargeInTransit': 'true' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/chargeintransit/input_additionals.add.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'chargeInTransit': 'dummyChargeInTransit' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/efficiency/input_additionals.add.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'efficiency': 'dummyEfficiency' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/endpos/input_additionals.add.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'endPos': 'dummyEndPosition' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:float'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/friendlypos/input_additionals.add.xml:4:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'friendlyPos': 'dummyFriendlyPos' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'boolType'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/friendlypos/input_additionals.add.xml:4:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_ENUMERATION_VALID: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'friendlyPos': [facet 'enumeration'] The value 'dummyFriendlyPos' is not an element of the set {'true', 'false', 'True', 'False', 'yes', 'no', 'on', 'off', '1', '0', 'x', '-'}.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/id/input_additionals.add.xml:6:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'chargingStation': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/id/input_additionals.add.xml:9:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'id': 'id with spaces' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'idType'.
< netedit/additionalElements/chargingstation/load/id/input_additionals.add.xml:9:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'chargingStation', attribute 'id': [facet 'pattern'] The value 'id with spaces' is not accepted by the pattern '[^ \t\n\r|\\;,']+'.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< <number> files checked

2 TESTS were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba :

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< <number> files checked
xml schemaCheck tests cfgs ( Last six runs Dec2020 )
xml schemaCheck tools ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests netconvert ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,49d0
< -- Unordered text as found by filter 'ERROR:SCHEMA' --
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#fromnode__missing1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'edge': The attribute 'from' is required but missing.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#fromnode__missing4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'edge': The attribute 'from' is required but missing.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__empty1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'id': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'idType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__empty1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'id': [facet 'pattern'] The value '' is not accepted by the pattern '[^ \t\n\r|\\;,']+'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__empty4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'id': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'idType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__empty4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'id': [facet 'pattern'] The value '' is not accepted by the pattern '[^ \t\n\r|\\;,']+'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__invalid4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'id': '4 5' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'idType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__invalid4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'id': [facet 'pattern'] The value '4 5' is not accepted by the pattern '[^ \t\n\r|\\;,']+'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__missing1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'edge': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#id__missing4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'edge': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#length__empty1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'length': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'positiveFloatType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#length__empty4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'length': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'positiveFloatType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#length__false1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'length': 'a' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'positiveFloatType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#length__false4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'length': 'a' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'positiveFloatType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#nolanes__empty1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'numLanes': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:positiveInteger'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#nolanes__empty4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'numLanes': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:positiveInteger'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#nolanes__false1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'numLanes': 'a' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:positiveInteger'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#nolanes__false4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'numLanes': 'a' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:positiveInteger'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#priority__false1/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'priority': 'a' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:int'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#priority__false4/input_edges.edg.xml:7:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'priority': 'a' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:int'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1a/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': 'a,1.450752924 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746614 1261.381695,168.644822 1247.
746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 1216.58218,189.5351793' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'shapeType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1a/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': [facet 'pattern'] The value 'a,1.450752924 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746614 1261.38
1695,168.644822 1247.746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 1216.58218,189.5351793' is not accepted by the pattern '((\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?(\s(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?)*)?'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1b/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': '1216.58218,a 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746614 1261.381695,168.644822 1247.7
46483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 1216.58218,189.5351793' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'shapeType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1b/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': [facet 'pattern'] The value '1216.58218,a 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746614 1261.381
695,168.644822 1247.746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 1216.58218,189.5351793' is not accepted by the pattern '((\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?(\s(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?)*)?'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1c/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': '1216.58218,1.450752924 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746614 1261.381695,168.644
822 1247.746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 a,189.5351793' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'shapeType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1c/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': [facet 'pattern'] The value '1216.58218,1.450752924 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.874661
4 1261.381695,168.644822 1247.746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 a,189.5351793' is not accepted by the pattern '((\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?(\s(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?)*)?'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1d/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': '1216.58218,1.450752924 a 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746614 1261.381695,168.6
44822 1247.746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 1216.58218,189.5351793' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'shapeType'.
< netconvert/import/XML/errors/broken_edge/edge#shape__false1d/input_edges.edg.xml:3:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'edge', attribute 'shape': [facet 'pattern'] The value '1216.58218,1.450752924 a 1232.660518,5.758930707 1247.746483,12.79363175 1261.381695,22.34111022 1273.151856,34.11127081 1282.699334,47.74648315 1289.734035,62.83244822 1294.042213,78.91078659 1295.492966,95.4929661 1294.042213,112.0751456 1289.734035,128.153484 1282.699334,143.2394491 1273.151856,156.8746
614 1261.381695,168.644822 1247.746483,178.1923005 1232.660518,185.2270015 1216.58218,189.5351793' is not accepted by the pattern '((\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?(\s(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)),(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+))(,(\-)?(\d+\.?|(\d*\.\d+)))?)*)?'.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< <number> files checked

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests nets ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,8d0
< -- Unordered text as found by filter 'ERROR:SCHEMA' --
< netconvert/function/railway/bidi_endOffset_invalid/net.netconvert:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'lane': The attribute 'shape' is required but missing.
< netconvert/import/SUMO/stopOffsets/incomplete_specification/input_net.net.xml:169:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'stopOffset': The attribute 'value' is required but missing.
< netconvert/import/SUMO/stopOffsets/warnings/input_net.net.xml:139:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'stopOffset', attribute 'value': '-1' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'nonNegativeFloatType'.
< netconvert/import/SUMO/stopOffsets/warnings/input_net.net.xml:139:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_MININCLUSIVE_VALID: Element 'stopOffset', attribute 'value': [facet 'minInclusive'] The value '-1' is less than the minimum value allowed ('0').
< netconvert/import/SUMO/stopOffsets/warnings/input_net.net.xml:154:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'stopOffset', attribute 'value': '-1' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'nonNegativeFloatType'.
< netconvert/import/SUMO/stopOffsets/warnings/input_net.net.xml:154:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_MININCLUSIVE_VALID: Element 'stopOffset', attribute 'value': [facet 'minInclusive'] The value '-1' is less than the minimum value allowed ('0').
< 
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< <number> files checked

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests routes ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,3d0
< Error on parsing 'sumo/meta/xml_invalid_schema/input_routes.rou.xml'!
< Traceback (most recent call last):
< XMLSyntaxError: Opening and ending tag mismatch: trip line 40 and flow, line 47, column 12
29,560c26,155
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalLane/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalLane': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalLane/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalLane': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalPos/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalPos': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalPosType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalPosLat/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalPosLat': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalPosLatType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalSpeed': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalSpeed': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/begin/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'begin': '' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/begin/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'begin': 'dummyBegin' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/begin/input_routes.rou.xml:62:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'begin': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/color/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'color': 'dummyColor' is not a valid value of the union type 'colorType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/color/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'color': '' is not a valid value of the union type 'colorType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': 'dummycontainerNumber' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': '-3' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:64:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': '2.5' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departLane/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departLane': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departLane/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departLane': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'departLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departPos/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departPos': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departPosType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departPosLat/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departPosLat': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departPosLatType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departSpeed': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departSpeed': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'departSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/end/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'end': '' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/end/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'end': 'dummyBegin' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/end/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'end': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/id/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'flow': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< <number> files checked

TEST were terminated before completion (TIMEOUT) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests sim_outputs ( Last six runs Dec2020 )

Test exceeded wallclock time limit of 300.0 seconds
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,208d0
< -- Unordered text as found by filter 'ERROR:SCHEMA' --
< sumo/cf_model/IDM/insert_with_speedLimit_speedFactor0.8/tripinfos.sumo:35:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'tripinfo', attribute 'timeLoss': '-0.06' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< sumo/extended/state/load_shifted/tripinfos.sumo.meso:47:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'tripinfo', attribute 'depart': '-10.00' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< sumo/extended/state/load_shifted/tripinfos.sumo:43:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'tripinfo', attribute 'depart': '-10.00' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:100:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:102:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:103:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:105:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:106:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:108:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:109:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:111:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:112:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:114:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:115:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:117:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:118:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:122:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:123:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:125:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:126:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:128:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:129:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:131:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:132:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:134:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:135:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:137:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'link': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
< sumo/output/examples/cross3ltl_meandata_amitran_filter/aggregated300.sumo.meso:138:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'actorConfig': The attribute 'averageSpeed' is required but missing.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< <number> files checked