09Nov20rv1_7_0+0890-63ce6de543 - detailed test results for TOOLS

To reconnect the TextTest GUI to these results, run:

texttest -a tools -d /home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/clangDebug/texttesttmp/clang3_64D.30Nov030818.1294 -g

To start TextTest for these tests, run:

texttest -a tools -d /home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/tests

default: 618 tests: 526 succeeded 88 FAILED 4 known bugs

Detailed information for the tests that FAILED:

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign costFunctionChecker flow ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua-log.txt for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,350d2
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router with input_flows_0.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router with input_flows_1.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router with input_flows_2.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router with input_flows_3.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

3 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua-log.txt for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,350d2
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router with input_trips_0.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router with input_trips_1.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router with input_trips_2.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Generating weights
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router with input_trips_3.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
assign costFunctionChecker identity ( Last six runs Nov2020 )
assign costFunctionChecker simple ( Last six runs Nov2020 )
assign costFunctionChecker three ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate binary ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.gz
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.gz
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.gz
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.gz
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate convergence ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,186d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,88d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 1 steps: 0.00000
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 2 steps: 0.00795
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 3 steps: 0.00752
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< < relative travel time deviation in the last 4 steps: 0.00692
< ------------------
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate external_gawron ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
4,114d3
< <<
< basename input_trips
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 4 edges
< >>> Decayed 0 unseen edges
< >>> Error avg:0 mean:0
< >>> Absolute Error avg:0 mean:0
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< basename input_trips
< step: 1
< get externalgawron
< run getRouteChoices
< ecoMeasure: None
< prefix: input_trips_001
< parse network file
< could not parse weights file: None
< parse dumpfile
< 0/dump_000_900.xml
< parse routeAltfile: 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< parse routeAltfile from externalGawron:  input_trips_000.rou.galt.xml
< new probability for route 1 for veh 0
< new probability for route 3 for veh 1
< new probability for route 5 for veh 2
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate filtered_tripinfo ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<tripinfos>
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="0" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="1" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="2" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="3" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="4" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="6" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="5" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="7" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="8" />
    <tripinfo departDelay="0.00" id="9" />
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate intermodal ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,107d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 3468.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 16
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< Persons: 
<  Inserted: 4
<  Running: 0
< 
< DijkstraRouter answered 7 queries and explored 16.71 edges on average.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Warning: Vehicle 'p0_0' aborted waiting for a person or container that will never come.
< Simulation ended at time: 3467.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="bus.0" depart="0.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="167.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.48" duration="167.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="29.00" timeLoss="40.81" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.0" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.1" depart="300.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="466.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="5.56" duration="166.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="5.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="28.00" timeLoss="40.82" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.1 person_bus.1" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <personinfo id="p0" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <walk depart="0.00" departPos="0.00" arrival="301.00" arrivalPos="98.10" duration="301.00" routeLength="385.04" timeLoss="31.93" maxSpeed="1.43"/>
        <ride waitingTime="84.00" vehicle="bus.1" depart="385.00" arrival="428.00" arrivalPos="59.97" duration="43.00" routeLength="214.40" timeLoss="12.38"/>
        <walk depart="428.00" departPos="59.97" arrival="491.00" arrivalPos="140.00" duration="63.00" routeLength="80.03" timeLoss="7.08" maxSpeed="1.43"/>
    </personinfo>
    <personinfo id="p2" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <walk depart="0.00" departPos="0.00" arrival="302.00" arrivalPos="98.10" duration="302.00" routeLength="385.04" timeLoss="36.91" maxSpeed="1.45"/>
        <ride waitingTime="83.00" vehicle="bus.1" depart="385.00" arrival="428.00" arrivalPos="59.97" duration="43.00" routeLength="214.40" timeLoss="12.38"/>
        <walk depart="428.00" departPos="59.97" arrival="492.00" arrivalPos="140.00" duration="64.00" routeLength="80.03" timeLoss="8.91" maxSpeed="1.45"/>
    </personinfo>
    <tripinfo id="v0" depart="0.00" departLane="e2_3" departPos="0.00" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="556.00" arrivalLane="e2_3" arrivalPos="120.00" arrivalSpeed="12.96" duration="556.00" routeLength="120.00" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="538.00" timeLoss="9.07" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_v0" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="v1" depart="2.00" departLane="e2_3" departPos="0.00" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="2.00" arrival="556.00" arrivalLane="e2_4" arrivalPos="120.00" arrivalSpeed="12.26" duration="554.00" routeLength="120.00" waitingTime="1.00" waitingCount="1" stopTime="536.00" timeLoss="10.00" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_v1" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <personinfo id="p1" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <ride waitingTime="0.00" vehicle="p1_0" depart="0.00" arrival="591.00" arrivalPos="145.03" duration="591.00" routeLength="644.89" timeLoss="541.14"/>
    </personinfo>
    <tripinfo id="p1_0" depart="0.00" departLane="begin_3" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="591.00" arrivalLane="end_3" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="12.11" duration="591.00" routeLength="644.89" waitingTime="530.00" waitingCount="1" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="541.14" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_p1_0 person_p1_0" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <personinfo id="p3" depart="0.00" type="DEFAULT_PEDTYPE">
        <walk depart="0.00" departPos="0.00" arrival="607.00" arrivalPos="140.00" duration="607.00" routeLength="645.11" timeLoss="82.76" maxSpeed="1.23"/>
    </personinfo>
    <tripinfo id="bus.2" depart="600.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="767.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="5.65" duration="167.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="3.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="30.00" timeLoss="39.89" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.2" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.3" depart="900.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1065.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.18" duration="165.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="2.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="29.00" timeLoss="39.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.3" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.4" depart="1200.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1368.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.12" duration="168.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="3.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="23.00" timeLoss="47.73" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.4" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.5" depart="1500.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1666.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.51" duration="166.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="2.00" waitingCount="2" stopTime="28.00" timeLoss="41.21" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.5" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="bus.6" depart="1800.00" departLane="begin_2" departPos="15.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="1967.00" arrivalLane="end_2" arrivalPos="145.03" arrivalSpeed="6.77" duration="167.00" routeLength="677.24" waitingTime="1.00" waitingCount="1" stopTime="21.00" timeLoss="48.38" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_bus.6" vType="bus" speedFactor="1.00" vaporized=""/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate mapmatchJunctions ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
2c2
< '-c', 'iteration_000_input_trips.duarcfg']
---
> '-c', '0/iteration_000_input_trips.duarcfg']
5,16d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', 'iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 177.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
18,33c6,7
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', 'iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', 'iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 177.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
1d0
< Loading configuration ... done.
4,40d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< Loading configuration ... done.
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< Loading configuration ... done.
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< Loading configuration ... done.
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="70.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.73" duration="70.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="89.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="13.04" duration="79.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="94.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.04" duration="74.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.22" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="99.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="15.05" duration="69.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.41" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="112.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.32" duration="72.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.28" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="138.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="11.55" duration="88.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="1.75" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="140.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="14.54" duration="80.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="10.80" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="153.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="12.32" duration="83.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="1.89" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="159.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="13.04" duration="79.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="2.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="middle_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="176.00" arrivalLane="middle_0" arrivalPos="1000.00" arrivalSpeed="11.91" duration="86.00" routeLength="994.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="1.82" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate recognize_error ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
8a9,37
> 
> =================================================================
> ==10240==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bbaa0  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bbaa0)
>     #1 0x7f30eb0fd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bbaa0  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bbaa0)
>     #1 0x7f30eb0fd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bbaa0  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bbaa0)
>     #1 0x7f30eb0fd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f30eb1bde1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bbaa0  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bbaa0)
>     #1 0x7f30eb0fd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f30eb1c16f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x8bbaa0  (/home/delphi/clangDebug/sumo/bin/duarouterD+0x8bbaa0)
>     #1 0x7f30eb0fd6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x2f839efb7601b1ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

2 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>
assign dua-iterate simple ( Last six runs Nov2020 )
assign dua-iterate unordered_input ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate start_with_routes ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 252.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_routes_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 249.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_routes_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_routes_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_routes_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_routes_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="129.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.49" duration="129.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.70" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="144.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="156.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.52" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.23" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="158.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.97" duration="138.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="13.65" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="173.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="27.59" duration="133.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.73" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="191.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.70" duration="131.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="9.53" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="217.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="22.81" duration="167.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="15.05" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="225.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="25.11" duration="145.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="10.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="226.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.29" duration="156.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="14.49" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="248.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.77" duration="158.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="10.23" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="DEFAULT_VEHTYPE" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate vtypes_add ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,35d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 3
< >> Running router on 2/input_trips_002.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 4
< >> Running router on 3/input_trips_003.rou.alt.xml
< <<
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t2" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t2" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign dua-iterate weight_memory ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in dualog ----------
5,84d4
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '0/iteration_000.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 244.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
< 
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001_input_trips_000.duarcfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Success.
< -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< '-c', '1/iteration_001.sumocfg']
< Loading configuration ... done.
< Loading done.
< Simulation started with time: 0.00
< Simulation ended at time: 243.00
< Reason: All vehicles have left the simulation.
< Performance: 
< Vehicles: 
<  Inserted: 10
<  Running: 0
<  Waiting: 0
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1
> Execution of <path-to>duarouter'] failed. Look into dua.log for details.
---------- Differences in output ----------
3,60d2
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 4 edges
< >>> Decayed 0 unseen edges
< >>> Error avg:0 mean:0
< >>> Absolute Error avg:0 mean:0
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 1
< >> Running router on 0/input_trips_000.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 7 edges
< >>> Decayed 0 unseen edges
< >>> Error avg:0.148571428571 mean:0
< >>> Absolute Error avg:0.202857142857 mean:0.02
< ------------------
< 
< > Executing step 2
< >> Running router on 1/input_trips_001.rou.alt.xml
< <<
< >> Running simulation
< <<
< >> Smoothing edge weights
< >>> Updated 7 edges
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Missing result in tripinfos ----------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<tripinfos xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/tripinfo_file.xsd">
    <tripinfo id="0" depart="0.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="125.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.47" duration="125.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.18" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_0" vType="t" speedFactor="1.06" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="1" depart="10.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="149.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.08" duration="139.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_1" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="2" depart="20.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="152.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.09" duration="132.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.06" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_2" vType="t" speedFactor="1.01" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="3" depart="30.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="154.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="30.10" duration="124.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="7.61" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_3" vType="t" speedFactor="1.08" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="4" depart="40.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="168.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="28.64" duration="128.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.01" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_4" vType="t" speedFactor="1.03" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="6" depart="60.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="186.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="29.07" duration="126.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.10" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_6" vType="t" speedFactor="1.05" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="5" depart="50.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="207.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.10" duration="157.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="5.95" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_5" vType="t" speedFactor="0.83" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="7" depart="70.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="219.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="24.63" duration="149.00" routeLength="2494.90" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="6.35" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_7" vType="t" speedFactor="0.89" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="8" depart="80.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="220.00" arrivalLane="rend_1" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="26.07" duration="140.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.52" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_8" vType="t" speedFactor="0.94" vaporized=""/>
    <tripinfo id="9" depart="90.00" departLane="beg_0" departPos="5.10" departSpeed="0.00" departDelay="0.00" arrival="242.00" arrivalLane="rend_0" arrivalPos="500.00" arrivalSpeed="23.82" duration="152.00" routeLength="3507.26" waitingTime="0.00" waitingCount="0" stopTime="0.00" timeLoss="4.09" rerouteNo="0" devices="tripinfo_9" vType="t" speedFactor="0.86" vaporized=""/>
</tripinfos>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : assign one-shot simple ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2,12d1
< ------------------
< 
< > Running simulation with update frequency 1800
< ------------------
< 
< > Running simulation with update frequency 300
< ------------------
< 
< > Running simulation with update frequency 15
< ------------------
<

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle complex ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,12
> sumo/parallel/runner.py:23:121: E501 line too long (139 > 120 characters)
> sumo/parallel/runner.py:37:121: E501 line too long (122 > 120 characters)
> traci/connection/parallelConnection/runner.py:23:1: F401 'subprocess' imported but unused
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:19:10: E401 multiple imports on one line
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:28:1: E402 module level import not at top of file
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:29:1: E402 module level import not at top of file
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:30:1: E402 module level import not at top of file
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:35:52: E231 missing whitespace after ','
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:40:121: E501 line too long (152 > 120 characters)
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:51:4: E111 indentation is not a multiple of four
> traci/person/arrivalPos/main.py:52:4: E111 indentation is not a multiple of four
> sumo/parallel/runner.py missing empty line 16 from __future__ import print_function

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle header ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
14a15,24
> src/microsim/traffic_lights/MSRailSignalControl.cpp header does not start
> src/netedit/GNEMoveElement.cpp broken @file reference /// @file    GNEMove.cpp
> src/netedit/GNEMoveElement.h broken @file reference /// @file    GNEMove.h
> src/netedit/GNENet.cpp 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xba in position 52073: invalid start byte
> src/netedit/GNENet.h 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xba in position 14467: invalid start byte
> src/netedit/elements/additional/GNEDetectorEntryExit.cpp 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xba in position 7982: invalid start byte
> src/utils/gui/div/GUIDesigns.cpp broken @file reference /// @file    GUIDesigns.h
> tests/complex/sumo/parallel/runner.py missing empty line 16 from __future__ import print_function
> tools/contributed/lisum-gui/src/main/java/module-info.java header does not start
> tools/contributed/traas/src/main/java/de/tudresden/ws/container/SumoTrafficLightType.java header does not start

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle netedit ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,11
> TAZElements/TAZ/move/vertex_new/test.py:55:1: W391 blank line at end of file
> netElements/edges/move/move_geometrypoint/test.py:55:1: W391 blank line at end of file
> neteditTestFunctions.py:31:16: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
> neteditTestFunctions.py:31:17: E262 inline comment should start with '# '
> neteditTestFunctions.py:32:20: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
> neteditTestFunctions.py:32:21: E262 inline comment should start with '# '
> neteditTestFunctions.py:269:121: E501 line too long (125 > 120 characters)
> neteditTestFunctions.py:328:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace
> neteditTestFunctions.py:400:9: E265 block comment should start with '# '
> neteditTestFunctions.py:1759:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace
> neteditTestFunctions.py:1760:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle netedit_additionals ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1
> chargingstation/lock_unlock/test.py:75:1: W391 blank line at end of file

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : build checkStyle tools ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,20
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:86:121: E501 line too long (154 > 120 characters)
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:353:29: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:354:29: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:355:29: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:356:33: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:362:121: E501 line too long (123 > 120 characters)
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:370:37: E127 continuation line over-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:375:79: W291 trailing whitespace
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:382:79: W291 trailing whitespace
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:496:33: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:497:33: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:498:33: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:499:37: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
> generateRailSignalConstraints.py:505:121: E501 line too long (127 > 120 characters)
> sumolib/miscutils.py:175:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
> sumolib/fpdiff.py:18:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
> sumolib/fpdiff.py:52:22: E711 comparison to None should be 'if cond is not None:'
> sumolib/fpdiff.py:54:27: E711 comparison to None should be 'if cond is not None:'
> contributed/lisum-gui/src/main/java/module-info.java header does not start
> contributed/traas/src/main/java/de/tudresden/ws/container/SumoTrafficLightType.java header does not start

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : import OSM build_passenger ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
11a12,68
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11711==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7add0476c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7add0476c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 1120 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #14 0x7f7adb6d6b96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7add0476c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7add10b6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7add0476c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7add107e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 648 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7f7adb6d6b96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Indirect leak of 432 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
>     #15 0x7f7adb6d6b96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Indirect leak of 192 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : import OSM taxiStop ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in additional ----------
9,18d8
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_6" name="Jägerstr./ Friedrichstr." lane="-4588219#3_0" startPos="94.46" endPos="114.46"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_7" name="Gendarmenmarkt" lane="-22972473#0_0" startPos="50.49" endPos="80.49"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_8" name="Park Inn" lane="100405009#3_0" startPos="-81.93" endPos="23.07"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_9" name="Am Kupfergraben" lane="22972219#0_0" startPos="60.34" endPos="80.34"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_10" name="Maritim Pro Arte" lane="158023913#0_0" startPos="58.39" endPos="88.39"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_11" name="Georgenstraße" lane="24243052#3_0" startPos="1.83" endPos="46.83"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_12" name="Staatsoper" lane="340498982#4_0" startPos="28.80" endPos="48.80"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_13" name="Hotel de Rome" lane="-24242882#1_0" startPos="0.00" endPos="20.00"/>
<     <chargingStation id="chargingStation_14" lane="112128418#5_0" startPos="51.26" endPos="71.26"/>
< </additional>
---------- Differences in errors ----------
61c61,88
< Warning: Module 'rtree' not available. Using brute-force fallback
---
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11622==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7b24f6f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7b24f6f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7b24f6f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7b2502fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7b24f6f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7b250336f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7b24f6f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf277e9c27b6e3eff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>     main(options)
>     file=output)
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : import OSM webWizard ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
132a133,201
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11818==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 736 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7fb8d07beb96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8d212f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8d212f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 38192 byte(s) in 434 object(s) allocated from:
>     #10 0x7fb8d2178b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 23280 byte(s) in 434 object(s) allocated from:
>     #9 0x7fb8d2178b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 14592 byte(s) in 17 object(s) allocated from:
>     #9 0x7fb8d2178b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 5712 byte(s) in 17 object(s) allocated from:
>     #3 0x7fb8d2178b9f  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fab9f)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb8d212f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb8d21efe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff change_to_unwritten_default ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9044==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f24bba556c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f24bba556c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f24bba556c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f24bbb15e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f24bba556c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f24bbb196f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f24bba556c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7b68048d57f912ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9065==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff copy_location ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9014==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0762e2a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0762e2a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0762e2a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0762eeae1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0762e2a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0762eee6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0762e2a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x73c454161d186fff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9045==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff crossing ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9025==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3ca2ef6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3ca2ef6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3ca2ef6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff3ca3afe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3ca2ef6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff3ca3b36f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff3ca2ef6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x1f500b14b562e1ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9055==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff delete_dead_end_edge ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,49
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9225==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f680652f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f680652f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f680652f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f68065efe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f680652f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f68065f36f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f680652f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x403ef23c9e6017ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9261==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff invalidated_neigh ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9104==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f90eed2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f90eed2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f90eed2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f90eedece1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f90eed2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f90eedf06f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f90eed2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xa5753eed1777acff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9121==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff join_junctions ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9008==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdde8db96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdde8db96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdde8db96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fdde8e79e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdde8db96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fdde8e7d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdde8db96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x9663b061a62f33ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9041==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff patch_on_import ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9058==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa3455e86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa3455e86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa3455e86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa3456a8e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa3455e86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa3456ac6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa3455e86c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x9517188f563301ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9088==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff roundabout ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9015==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f289d3d96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f289d3d96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f289d3d96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f289d499e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f289d3d96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f289d49d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f289d3d96c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x610650d2afbc6bff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9051==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : net netdiff split_edge ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9026==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f338f2746c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f338f2746c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f338f2746c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f338f334e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f338f2746c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f338f3386f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f338f2746c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xda7cd5496769afff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9056==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport generateRailSignalConstraints one_switch trip_input ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13945==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5f33a3f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5f33a3f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5f33a3f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5f33affe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5f33a3f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5f33b036f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5f33a3f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf1ddd4b77657efff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows basic ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13690==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f42505086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f42505086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f42505086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f42505c8e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f42505086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f42505cc6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f42505086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x4669639e8f0497ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows begin_end ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13692==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd50af596c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd50af596c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd50af596c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd50b019e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd50af596c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd50b01d6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd50af596c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x51ef7ab87b3c1fff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows extendFringe ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,25
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13928==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb465fbe6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb465fbe6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb465fbe6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb46607ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb465fbe6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb4660826f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb465fbe6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xc293c0eeda4878ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows few_stops ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
3a4,27
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13883==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb137cff6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb137cff6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb137cff6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb137dbfe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb137cff6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb137dc36f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb137cff6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xcb6b8dac41b5a9ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows hrtime ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13797==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f305c2826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f305c2826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f305c2826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f305c342e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f305c2826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f305c3466f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f305c2826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x26304272b36c87ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows name_missing ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13889==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb1779786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb1779786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb1779786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb177a38e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb1779786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb177a3c6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb1779786c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf924de48d44e8ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows night ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13906==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17469316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17469316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17469316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f17469f1e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17469316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f17469f56f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f17469316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x875ddf99f552baff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows parking ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13736==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc0248af6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc0248af6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc0248af6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc02496fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc0248af6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc0249736f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc0248af6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xc0cdcc0028b756ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows pt_routes_from_ptlines_file ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13719==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2af0f56c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2af0f56c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2af0f56c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc2af1b5e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2af0f56c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc2af1b96f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2af0f56c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x4845a51d6f0e33ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows random_begin ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13712==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3d5ba2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3d5ba2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3d5ba2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3d5baece1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3d5ba2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3d5baf06f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3d5ba2c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x468855f9e028c1ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows reverse_at_stop ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,64
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13912==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 368 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #12 0x7f6c42446b96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6c45d8a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6c45d8a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 6256 byte(s) in 17 object(s) allocated from:
>     #12 0x7f6c42446b96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6c45d8a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f6c45e4ae1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f6c45d8a6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f6c45e4e6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 576 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #20 0x7f6c42446b96  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)
> 
> Indirect leak of 368 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows stop_duration ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13774==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f78ebe826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f78ebe826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f78ebe826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f78ebf42e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f78ebe826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f78ebf466f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f78ebe826c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xc265dd217a9057ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : public_transport ptlines2flows types ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13761==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4235eaf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4235eaf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4235eaf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f4235f6fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4235eaf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f4235f736f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f4235eaf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x6e4a370175100bff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route findAllRoutes ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in routes ----------
4,7c4,7
<     <route id="1" edges="1fi 1si 4o 4fi 4si 2o 2fi"/>
<     <route id="2" edges="1fi 1si 3o 3fi 3si 2o 2fi"/>
<     <route id="3" edges="1fi 1si 4o 4fi 4si 3o 3fi 3si 2o 2fi"/>
<     <route id="4" edges="1fi 1si 3o 3fi 3si 4o 4fi 4si 2o 2fi"/>
---
>     <route id="1" edges="1fi 1si 3o 3fi 3si 2o 2fi"/>
>     <route id="2" edges="1fi 1si 4o 4fi 4si 2o 2fi"/>
>     <route id="3" edges="1fi 1si 3o 3fi 3si 4o 4fi 4si 2o 2fi"/>
>     <route id="4" edges="1fi 1si 4o 4fi 4si 3o 3fi 3si 2o 2fi"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes default ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9923==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd4841016c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd4841016c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd4841016c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd4841c1e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd4841016c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd4841c56f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd4841016c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xec3873bf1fb45fff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes edge_loop ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9998==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51cb4036c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51cb4036c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51cb4036c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f51cb4c3e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51cb4036c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f51cb4c76f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f51cb4036c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xaaf7b670ff64b3ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes internal ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==10024==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff6716156c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff6716156c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff6716156c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff6716d5e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff6716156c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff6716d96f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff6716156c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x2d33eded9b1ebdff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes min-air-dist ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9971==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd2b3b8b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd2b3b8b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd2b3b8b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd2b3c4be1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd2b3b8b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fd2b3c4f6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fd2b3b8b6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x3c259d929b315ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes min-dist ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9924==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff8468046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff8468046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff8468046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff8468c4e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff8468046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff8468c86f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff8468046c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xdac777d6977798ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes node_loop ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==10001==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f54f3e7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f54f3e7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f54f3e7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f54f3f3ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f54f3e7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f54f3f426f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f54f3e7e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x4ab2b478d66690ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes restriction-output ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9922==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0b0b8316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0b0b8316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0b0b8316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0b0b8f1e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0b0b8316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0b0b8f56f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0b0b8316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xe35b0e1462573fff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : route implausibleRoutes standalone ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==9925==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3225e646c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3225e646c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3225e646c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3225f24e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3225e646c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3225f286f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3225e646c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7e0e012e605e5bff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : sumolib patch_network ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13584==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1aaa4b26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1aaa4b26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1aaa4b26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1aaa572e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1aaa4b26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1aaa5766f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1aaa4b26c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xa090fc8c741896ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
1a26,49
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13605==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : sumolib sumolib3d ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==13455==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f7d57c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f7d57c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f7d57c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0f7d63ce1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f7d57c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0f7d6406f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f7d57c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x118f9198db9b5dff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 1flow ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11026==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13751de6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13751de6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13751de6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f137529ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13751de6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f13752a26f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f13751de6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x468b18660192c9ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 2tls ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11017==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5b9d8006c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5b9d8006c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5b9d8006c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5b9d8c0e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5b9d8006c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f5b9d8c46f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f5b9d8006c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x3ec4f9015b8b0cff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 2tls_add ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11034==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff374a3c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff374a3c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff374a3c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff374afce1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff374a3c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7ff374b006f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7ff374a3c6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x6ae67653d271f9ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 2tls_intermediate_node ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11048==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08383df6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08383df6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08383df6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f083849fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08383df6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f08384a36f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f08383df6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf2b0b016b984f5ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 3flows ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11040==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1d627f06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1d627f06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1d627f06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1d628b0e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1d627f06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1d628b46f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1d627f06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd1542cfb2c573eff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 4flows ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11041==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f9aaa16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f9aaa16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f9aaa16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0f9ab61e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f9aaa16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0f9ab656f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0f9aaa16c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xd217f4fb7dc4fbff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator 4flows_b ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11024==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f460b5316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f460b5316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f460b5316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f460b5f1e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f460b5316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f460b5f56f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f460b5316c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x65f57f8cb1a7beff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : tls tlsCoordinator basic ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11051==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc9344086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc9344086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc9344086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc9344c8e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc9344086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc9344cc6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc9344086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xea3e88d718d517ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips duarouter_options ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11461==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fcb3e6086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fcb3e6086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fcb3e6086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fcb3e6c8e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fcb3e6086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fcb3e6cc6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fcb3e6086c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x527c702ec4b372ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips junctionTaz ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11473==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2d4a9e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2d4a9e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2d4a9e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc2d4b5ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2d4a9e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fc2d4b626f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fc2d4a9e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x83f78f31c90ecff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips junctionTaz_flow ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11469==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1fef90f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1fef90f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1fef90f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1fef9cfe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1fef90f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f1fef9d36f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f1fef90f6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xc20e6f44a498c5ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips junctionTaz_validate ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11475==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa81b0836c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa81b0836c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa81b0836c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa81b143e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa81b0836c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fa81b1476f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fa81b0836c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7bfb362e35fc7dff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11544==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips persontrips ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,30
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11319==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 56800 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7f445ee0a377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f445edc06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f445edc06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 13600 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7f445ee0a377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f445edc06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f445ee80e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f445edc06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f445ee846f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f445edc06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x6623af3b6bc9d2ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips persontrips_junctionTaz ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,30
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11340==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 56800 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7fb6ada9a377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb6ada506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb6ada506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 13600 byte(s) in 100 object(s) allocated from:
>     #6 0x7fb6ada9a377  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1fb377)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb6ada506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb6adb10e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb6ada506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fb6adb146f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fb6ada506c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x4c2cbfddc06d47ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips validate ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11460==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c7d6d06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c7d6d06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c7d6d06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7c7d790e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c7d6d06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f7c7d7946f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f7c7d6d06c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xe05a859a2c1750ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11485==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips validate_intermediate ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11427==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0c25d206c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0c25d206c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0c25d206c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0c25de0e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0c25d206c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f0c25de46f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f0c25d206c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x6afe06481774fdff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11543==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips vclass_additional_file ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11212==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fae174bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fae174bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fae174bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fae1757fe1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fae174bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fae175836f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fae174bf6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x10ab796d1107baff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : trip randomTrips vtype_additional_file_validate ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,48
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11426==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f896979e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f896979e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f896979e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f896985ee1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f896979e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f89698626f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f896979e6c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xf000985df64ef4ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).
> 
> =================================================================
> ==11449==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter attrs ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==12020==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f89255f66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f89255f66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f89255f66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f89256b6e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f89255f66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f89256ba6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f89255f66c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xb1f3b1edac0366ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter default ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==12016==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdd4f3a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdd4f3a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdd4f3a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fdd4f464e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdd4f3a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7fdd4f4686f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7fdd4f3a46c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0xc5bfe9070f5c9bff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter discount-sources ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==12018==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3e6fd276c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3e6fd276c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3e6fd276c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3e6fde7e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3e6fd276c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f3e6fdeb6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f3e6fd276c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x2129b794ae73e7ff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs jtcrouter fringe_flows ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,24
> 
> =================================================================
> ==12017==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 280 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f020c7586c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 60008 byte(s) in 394 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f020c7586c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f020c7586c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f020c818e1e  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x271e1e)
>     #3 0xfffffffe00000000  (<unknown module>)
> 
> Indirect leak of 960 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f020c7586c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x7f020c81c6f0  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x2756f0)
> 
> Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>     #1 0x7f020c7586c8  (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxerces-c-3.2.so+0x1b16c8)
>     #2 0x84c6dc9b16e54eff  (<unknown module>)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 62264 byte(s) leaked in 414 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler optimize_1 ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2c2
< Wrote 98 routes (96 distinct) achieving total count 751 (100.00%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 100.00%
---
> Wrote 98 routes (98 distinct) achieving total count 751 (100.00%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 100.00%
---------- Differences in routes ----------
113c113
<         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
209c209
<         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler optimize_2 ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in routes ----------
8c8
<         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
113c113
<         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
182c182
<         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="120 120.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
209c209
<         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="109 109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler optimize_few_detectors ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in routes ----------
5,6c5,6
<     <route id="13" edges="-43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 -60 -60.80.00"/> <!-- 60 -->
<     <route id="17" edges="-68 -43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60"/> <!-- 80 -->
---
>     <route id="13" edges="-43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 -60 -60.80.00"/> <!-- 73 -->
>     <route id="17" edges="-68 -43 -43.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60"/> <!-- 67 -->
8,9c8,9
<     <flow id="13" begin="0.00" end="98.51" number="60" route="13"/>
<     <flow id="17" begin="0.49" end="97.02" number="80" route="17"/>
---
>     <flow id="13" begin="0.00" end="98.51" number="73" route="13"/>
>     <flow id="17" begin="0.49" end="97.02" number="67" route="17"/>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler small_input_noSampling_optimize ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2,3c2,3
< Wrote 53 routes (29 distinct) achieving total count 440 (58.59%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 44.93%
< Warning: underflow locations: count 98, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 14.00 (('23', '23.80.00')), mean 3.24 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 4.00 (total 318)
---
> Wrote 53 routes (29 distinct) achieving total count 440 (58.59%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 46.38%
> Warning: underflow locations: count 98, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 15.00 (('11', '11.80.00')), mean 3.24 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 3.00 (total 318)
---------- Differences in routes ----------
5c5
<         <route edges="-79 -79.80.00 75 75.121.42 120 120.180.00 -120 -120.180.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="-60 -60.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00"/>
8c8
<         <route edges="-27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 75 75.121.42"/>
---
>         <route edges="-27 -27.80.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
11c11
<         <route edges="109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 5"/>
---
>         <route edges="-92.180.00 -60 -60.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00"/>
14c14
<         <route edges="-27 -27.80.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45"/>
---
>         <route edges="-15 -15.180.00 15 15.180.00"/>
20c20
<         <route edges="123 123.121.42 -123 -123.121.42 -109 -109.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 64 64.80.00"/>
---
>         <route edges="109.80.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 5"/>
23c23
<         <route edges="-37 -37.80.00 31 31.80.00 64 64.80.00 -64"/>
---
>         <route edges="-37 -37.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 109 109.80.00 131 131.180.00"/>
26c26
<         <route edges="27 27.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 15 15.180.00 -144 -144.121.42 -131"/>
---
>         <route edges="15 15.180.00 -123 -123.121.42 -120 -120.180.00 -75 -75.121.42 -60"/>
29c29
<         <route edges="15 15.180.00 -123 -123.121.42 -120 -120.180.00 -75 -75.121.42 -60"/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : turndefs routeSampler small_input_optimize ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
2,3c2,3
< Wrote 53 routes (28 distinct) achieving total count 442 (58.85%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 43.48%
< Warning: underflow locations: count 97, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 14.00 (('23', '23.80.00')), mean 3.26 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 4.00 (total 316)
---
> Wrote 52 routes (28 distinct) achieving total count 442 (58.85%) at 138 locations. GEH<5 for 44.20%
> Warning: underflow locations: count 98, min 1.00 (('-58.121.42', '64')), max 15.00 (('11', '11.80.00')), mean 3.22 Q1 1.00, median 2.00, Q3 4.00 (total 316)
---------- Differences in routes ----------
5,7d4
<         <route edges="43 68 -45 -45.80.00 -27 -27.80.00 27 27.80.00 45"/>
<     </vehicle>
<     <vehicle id="1" depart="1.87">
10,14c7,8
<     <vehicle id="2" depart="3.74">
<         <route edges="-27.80.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00 23 23.80.00 31 31.80.00 60 60.80.00 75 75.121.42"/>
<     </vehicle>
<     <vehicle id="3" depart="5.60">
<         <route edges="-3.180.00 11 11.80.00 109 109.80.00 123"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="1" depart="1.90">
>         <route edges="-60 -60.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00"/>
16,17c10,11
<     <vehicle id="4" depart="7.47">
<         <route edges="-131 -131.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 43 68 -45 -45.80.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="2" depart="3.81">
>         <route edges="31.80.00 -31 -31.80.00 -23 -23.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27 27.80.00 -27 -27.80.00"/>
19,20c13,14
<     <vehicle id="5" depart="9.34">
<         <route edges="144 144.121.42 -15 -15.180.00 3 3.180.00 -71 -55 -55.80.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="3" depart="5.71">
>         <route edges="-131 -131.180.00 -109 -109.80.00 -11 -11.80.00 3 3.180.00 27"/>
22,23c16,17
<     <vehicle id="6" depart="11.21">
<         <route edges="3 3.180.00 -3 -3.180.00 11 11.80.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="4" depart="7.62">
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests routes ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
29,130d28
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalLane/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalLane': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalLane/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalLane': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalPos/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalPos': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalPosType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalPosLat/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalPosLat': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalPosLatType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalSpeed': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/arrivalSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'arrivalSpeed': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'arrivalSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/begin/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'begin': '' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/begin/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'begin': 'dummyBegin' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/begin/input_routes.rou.xml:62:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'begin': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/color/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'color': 'dummyColor' is not a valid value of the union type 'colorType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/color/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'color': '' is not a valid value of the union type 'colorType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': 'dummycontainerNumber' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': '-3' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/containerNumber/input_routes.rou.xml:64:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'containerNumber': '2.5' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:nonNegativeInteger'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departLane/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departLane': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departLane/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departLane': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'departLaneType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departPos/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departPos': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departPosType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departPosLat/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departPosLat': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departPosLatType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departSpeed': 'dummyDepart' is not a valid value of the union type 'departSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/departSpeed/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'departSpeed': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'departSpeedType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/end/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'end': '' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/end/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'end': 'dummyBegin' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/end/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_3: Element 'flow', attribute 'end': '-12' is not a valid value of the union type 'timeType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/id/input_routes.rou.xml:56:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'flow': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/id/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'id': '' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'idType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/id/input_routes.rou.xml:58:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'flow', attribute 'id': [facet 'pattern'] The value '' is not accepted by the pattern '[^ \t\n\r|\\;,']+'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/id/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_DATATYPE_VALID_1_2_1: Element 'flow', attribute 'id': 'id with spaces' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'idType'.
< netedit/demandElements/flow/load/id/input_routes.rou.xml:60:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_PATTERN_VALID: Element 'flow', attribute 'id': [facet 'pattern'] The value 'id with spaces' is not accepted by the pattern '[^ \t\n\r|\\;,']+'.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : xml schemaCheck tests sim_outputs ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,747
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:100:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:103:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:106:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:109:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:112:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:115:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:118:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:121:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:124:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:127:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:130:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:133:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:136:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:139:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:142:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:145:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:148:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:151:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:154:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:157:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:160:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:163:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:166:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:169:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:172:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:175:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:178:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:181:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
> complex/state/dists_xml/state.complex.meso:184:0:ERROR:SCHEMASV:SCHEMAV_CVC_COMPLEX_TYPE_4: Element 'segment': The attribute 'id' is required but missing.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

Detailed information for the tests that had known bugs:

TEST had known bugs (see #5409) on ts-sim-build-ba : detector flowrouter motorway_ramps lane_based ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

option lane-based does not work
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'routes' matching 'on3 3 off3')
---------- Differences in flows ----------
2c2,3
<     <flow id="1_off3.qPKW" departSpeed="max" departPos="last" departLane="best" route="1_off3.qPKW" number="450" begin="0" end="3600"/>
---
>     <flow id="1_0_9_0.qPKW" departSpeed="max" departPos="last" departLane="best" route="1_0_9_0.qPKW" number="450" begin="0" end="3600"/>
>     <flow id="on3_0_off3_0.qPKW" departSpeed="max" departPos="last" departLane="best" route="on3_0_off3_0.qPKW" number="450" begin="0" end="3600"/>
---------- Differences in routes ----------
2c2,3
<     <route id="1_off3.qPKW" edges="1 2 3 off3"/>
---
>     <route id="1_0_9_0.qPKW" edges="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9"/>
>     <route id="on3_0_off3_0.qPKW" edges="on3 3 off3"/>

TEST had known bugs (see #2620) on ts-sim-build-ba : projects evacuation plain ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

unstable inputs
(This bug was triggered by text found in the full difference report matching 'Warning')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,6925d0
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'waterway.canal' (first occurence for edge '4041237#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4045243#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4068019#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4068043#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4068192').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.tertiary' (first occurence for edge '4377008#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.tertiary' (first occurence for edge '4377122#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.share_busway' in type 'cycleway.share_busway|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4377785#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4383334').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'highway.construction' (first occurence for edge '4391568').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4395586#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.share_busway' in type 'cycleway.share_busway|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4395950#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite' in type 'cycleway.opposite|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4396234').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.living_street' (first occurence for edge '4410583').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.lane' in type 'cycleway.lane|highway.secondary_link' (first occurence for edge '4484071').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.cycleway' (first occurence for edge '4492364#0').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'railway.disused' (first occurence for edge '4525886').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'highway.proposed' (first occurence for edge '4611776#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.none' in type 'cycleway.none|highway.tertiary' (first occurence for edge '4612758#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4615457#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4615457#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.shared' in type 'cycleway.shared|highway.secondary' (first occurence for edge '4615594#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite' in type 'cycleway.opposite|highway.living_street' (first occurence for edge '4639037#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite_track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4686018#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4686018#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|cycleway.track|cycleway.track|highway.residential' (first occurence for edge '4686018#0').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'waterway.riverbank' (first occurence for edge '4686373#0').
< Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.shared_lane' in type 'cycleway.shared_lane|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '4790833#0').
< Warning: Discarding unusable type 'railway.abandoned' (first occurence for edge '4790904').
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in output ----------
1,97d0
< Parsing types from <DIR>/osmNetconvert.typ.xml'... done.
< Parsing nodes from osm-file 'osm_bbox.osm.xml'... 
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 3215103784 with 288002013
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 3987794203 with 3987794202
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 3997661445 with 3517810193
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 4016273048 with 26992494
< Found duplicate nodes. Substituting 4016273049 with 2306772973
< done.
< Parsing edges from osm-file 'osm_bbox.osm.xml'... done.
< Removing duplicate edges... 
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 310058575
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 310058576
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 310058577
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 335703516
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 335703519
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 335703532
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 377118659
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 377494320
< Found duplicate edges. Removing 391385403
< done.
< Adding new type 'highway.service|railway.tram' (first occurence for edge '167272531#0').
< Parsing relations from osm-file 'osm_bbox.osm.xml'... 
< done.
<  Removed 1494 traffic lights before loading plain-XML
<  Import done:
<    37203 nodes loaded.
<    34 types loaded.
<    36921 edges loaded.
< Proj projection parameters used: '+proj=utm +zone=33 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs'.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- New result in catalogue ----------
No files or directories were created, edited or deleted.

TEST had known bugs (see #7446) on ts-sim-build-ba : route cut_routes pt person ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

rides without from are not cut
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'trips' matching 'ride_off_nofrom')
---------- Differences in trips ----------
8a9,11
>     <person depart="0.00" id="ride_off_nofrom">
>         <ride from="53356539#0" lines="140:1" to="4710636#2"/>
>     </person>

TEST had known bugs (see #5588) on ts-sim-build-ba : xml csv2xml meandata_edges_utf8 ( Last six runs Nov2020 )

python2 csv reader cannot handle utf8
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching 'UnicodeEncodeError')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,5
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>     main()
>     writeHierarchicalXml(xsd.XsdStructure(options.xsd), options)
>     for raw in csv.reader(inputf, delimiter=options.delimiter):
> UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe4' in position 25: ordinal not in range(128)
---------- Differences in xml ----------
1,16c1
< <meandata>
<     <interval begin="0.00" end="60.00" id="dump_60">
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="ä" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="1o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="1si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="2fi" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="2o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="2si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="3fi" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="3o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="3si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="4fi" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="4o" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<         <edge arrived="0" departed="0" entered="0" id="4si" laneChangedFrom="0" laneChangedTo="0" left="0" sampledSeconds="0.00"/>
<     </interval>
< </meandata>
---
> <meandata
\ Kein Zeilenumbruch am Dateiende.