texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/texttesttmp/extra_clangD.30Sep110613.2942516 -g
texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,4 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long' > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 + -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'SUMOTime' (aka 'long long') > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==64959==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x5cc159b87ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x5cc15b6989f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x5cc15a4af239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x7923f5e4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==64963==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x59a6299caec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x59a62b4db9f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x59a62a2f2239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x734b2884c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 4a5,15 > > ================================================================= > ==64998==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x581be279aec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x581be42ab9f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x581be30c2239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x77180224c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==64954==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x584c30ab7ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x584c325c89f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x584c313df239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x7b31f5c4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==65011==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x64a1ed7c5ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x64a1ef2d69f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x64a1ee0ed239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x75974e64c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==65008==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x57ad85d46ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x57ad878579f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x57ad8666e239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x770747c4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 1a2,12 > > ================================================================= > ==64988==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x556660f9eec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 209291bb21eea3e884be78447365a89f63e8abfd) > #1 0x556662aaf9f9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20 > #2 0x5566618c6239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x775cf704c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,2 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long' > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions ( Last six runs Sep2025 )
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 1a2,3 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long' > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26
---------- Differences in output ---------- 20,26c20 < DijkstraRouter answered 398 queries and explored 3.99 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 318 queries and explored 3.00 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 246 queries and explored 3.33 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 174 queries and explored 3.67 edges on average. --- > DijkstraRouter answered 1136 queries and explored 3.52 edges on average.
---------- Differences in output ---------- 18,32c18 < DijkstraRouter answered 90 queries and explored 16.00 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 32 queries and explored 20.38 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 12 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 24 queries and explored 19.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 16 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 22 queries and explored 25.36 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 2 queries and explored 22.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 8 queries and explored 28.00 edges on average. --- > DijkstraRouter answered 206 queries and explored 19.77 edges on average.
consistent handling of unreachable arrivalPos (This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching 'Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route') ---------- Differences in errors ---------- 1c1,3 < Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route. No connection between edge 'beg' and edge 'end'. --- > Warning: No connection between edge 'end' and edge 'end' found. > Warning: No route for vehicle '2' found. > Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route. ---------- Differences in vehroutes ---------- 5,8d4 < <vehicle id="1" depart="0.00" arrival="23.00"> < <route edges="beg"/> < </vehicle> <
consider via (This bug was triggered by FAILING to find text in file 'vehroutes' matching 'route edges=.*A1toA2') ---------- Differences in vehroutes ---------- 5c5 < <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="64.00"> --- > <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="45.00"> 7,8c7,8 < <route replacedOnEdge="" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/> < <route edges="A0toB0 B0toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/> --- > <route replacedOnEdge="" reason="device.rerouting" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/> > <route edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toD2 D2toD3"/>devices rerouting via route ( Last six runs Sep2025 )