texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/texttesttmp/extra_clangD.31Jul111905.3539868 -g
texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,4 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long' > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 + -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'SUMOTime' (aka 'long long') > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==97789==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x5a9b20bc86b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x5a9b226211c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x5a9b2147b8f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x7e7d9984c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==97788==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x6279551736b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x627956bcc1c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x627955a268f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x7a51e444c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 4a5,15 > > ================================================================= > ==97802==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x5fcf63d196b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x5fcf657721c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x5fcf645cc8f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x7b6bc964c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==97780==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x647c8fb806b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x647c915d91c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x647c904338f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x721ad0e4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==97817==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x58190ef2e6b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x5819109871c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x58190f7e18f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x71b9c544c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,11 > > ================================================================= > ==97807==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x6030c3e856b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x6030c58de1c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x6030c47388f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x7ee113e4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 1a2,12 > > ================================================================= > ==97796==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x55d5c3c306b1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x29926b1) (BuildId: 34b69924d16e3b905b15f71ada2178291a4b8aee) > #1 0x55d5c56891c9 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:714:20 > #2 0x55d5c44e38f9 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24 > #3 0x72f2ae84c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682) > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ---------- New result in exitcode ---------- 1
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 0a1,2 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long' > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions ( Last six runs Jul2025 )
---------- Differences in errors ---------- 1a2,3 > /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long' > SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26
---------- Differences in output ---------- 20,26c20 < DijkstraRouter answered 398 queries and explored 3.99 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 318 queries and explored 3.00 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 246 queries and explored 3.33 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 174 queries and explored 3.67 edges on average. --- > DijkstraRouter answered 1136 queries and explored 3.52 edges on average.
---------- Differences in output ---------- 18,32c18 < DijkstraRouter answered 90 queries and explored 16.00 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 32 queries and explored 20.38 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 12 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 24 queries and explored 19.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 16 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 22 queries and explored 25.36 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 2 queries and explored 22.50 edges on average. < DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average). < DijkstraRouter answered 8 queries and explored 28.00 edges on average. --- > DijkstraRouter answered 206 queries and explored 19.77 edges on average.
consistent handling of unreachable arrivalPos (This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching 'Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route') ---------- Differences in errors ---------- 1c1,3 < Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route. No connection between edge 'beg' and edge 'end'. --- > Warning: No connection between edge 'end' and edge 'end' found. > Warning: No route for vehicle '2' found. > Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route. ---------- Differences in vehroutes ---------- 5,8d4 < <vehicle id="1" depart="0.00" arrival="23.00"> < <route edges="beg"/> < </vehicle> <
consider via (This bug was triggered by FAILING to find text in file 'vehroutes' matching 'route edges=.*A1toA2') ---------- Differences in vehroutes ---------- 5c5 < <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="64.00"> --- > <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="45.00"> 7,8c7,8 < <route replacedOnEdge="" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/> < <route edges="A0toB0 B0toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/> --- > <route replacedOnEdge="" reason="device.rerouting" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/> > <route edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toD2 D2toD3"/>devices rerouting via route ( Last six runs Jul2025 )