14Nov2025 - detailed test results for SUMO.astar

To reconnect the TextTest GUI to these results, run:

texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/texttesttmp/extra_clangD.30Nov110424.1807505 -g

To start TextTest for these tests, run:

texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests

astar: 379 tests: 351 succeeded 25 FAILED 3 known bugs

Detailed information for the tests that FAILED:

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting junctionTaz viaJunctions ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,4
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long'
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26 
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 + -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'SUMOTime' (aka 'long long')
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_astar ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336094==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5a7371723821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x5a737325e749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x5a737206c019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7e7ee384c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_ch ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336102==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5e76246ea821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x5e7626225749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x5e7625033019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x781f9524c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_disconnected ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
4a5,15
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336118==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5cc231280821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x5cc232dbb749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x5cc231bc9019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7710ac04c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_flow ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336084==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5a2d69990821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x5a2d6b4cb749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x5a2d6a2d9019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7f7cdf04c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_random_weights ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336146==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x62448e003821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x62448fb3e749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x62448e94c019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7a7c6ea4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel public_walk ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336147==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x6215e4d69821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x6215e68a4749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x6215e56b2019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x788daea4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel taz_astar_landmark_parallel ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,12
> 
> =================================================================
> ==2336114==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x58fa67b12821 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x34ee821) (BuildId: 37ba1bd83fb4d96918fde79fe5d885862d72f05a)
>     #1 0x58fa6964d749 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:746:20
>     #2 0x58fa6845b019 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7067e284c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting personTrip bike_public_walk ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
42c42
< DijkstraRouter answered 1 queries and explored 50.00 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 1 queries and explored 55.00 edges on average.

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting reroute_congestions exit_times ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
5c5
< Simulation ended at time: 4210.00.
---
> Simulation ended at time: 4209.00.
13c13
<  RouteLength: 3713.90
---
>  RouteLength: 3717.15
15,17c15,17
<  Duration: 405.38
<  WaitingTime: 83.75
<  TimeLoss: 133.90
---
>  Duration: 406.22
>  WaitingTime: 84.41
>  TimeLoss: 134.44
19c19
< DijkstraRouter answered 3502 queries and explored 67.90 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 3504 queries and explored 68.61 edges on average.
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
13,14c13,14
<     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="365.00">
<         <route cost="246.28" savings="0.00" edges="-2472 -1782 1784 -1892 -829 833 2386 -2370 2319 2321 2365 -2405" exitTimes="76.00 108.00 118.00 160.00 175.00 188.00 209.00 270.00 287.00 317.00 349.00 365.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="364.00">
>         <route cost="246.28" savings="0.00" edges="-2472 -1782 1784 -1892 -829 833 2386 -2370 2319 2321 2365 -2405" exitTimes="76.00 108.00 118.00 160.00 175.00 188.00 209.00 270.00 287.00 317.00 349.00 364.00"/>
33,34c33,34
<     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="397.00">
<         <route cost="303.04" savings="0.00" edges="1617 -1617 -1575 -1338 -493 -264 -250 -232 -222 36 1329 -1458" exitTimes="45.00 81.00 99.00 112.00 180.00 201.00 219.00 245.00 264.00 304.00 360.00 397.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="396.00">
>         <route cost="303.04" savings="0.00" edges="1617 -1617 -1575 -1338 -493 -264 -250 -232 -222 36 1329 -1458" exitTimes="45.00 81.00 99.00 112.00 180.00 201.00 219.00 245.00 264.00 303.00 360.00 396.00"/>
38c38
<         <route cost="182.41" savings="0.00" edges="-1784 1784 -1892 -829 833 2386 -2370 1903 2058 2438" exitTimes="90.00 101.00 135.00 162.00 186.00 205.00 275.00 366.00 384.00 407.00"/>
---
>         <route cost="182.41" savings="0.00" edges="-1784 1784 -1892 -829 833 2386 -2370 1903 2058 2438" exitTimes="90.00 101.00 135.00 162.00 186.00 205.00 276.00 366.00 384.00 407.00"/>
42c42
<         <route cost="265.91" savings="0.00" edges="-222 222 240 254 278 652 662 833 2386 -2370 1903 2058 2438" exitTimes="36.00 55.00 82.00 111.00 122.00 159.00 180.00 191.00 211.00 278.00 368.00 386.00 409.00"/>
---
>         <route cost="265.91" savings="0.00" edges="-222 222 240 254 278 652 662 833 2386 -2370 1903 2058 2438" exitTimes="36.00 55.00 82.00 111.00 122.00 159.00 180.00 191.00 211.00 278.00 368.00 387.00 409.00"/>
50c50
<         <route cost="274.43" savings="0.00" edges="-51 45 -3 5 222 240 254 278 652 662 833 1454 1586 2427" exitTimes="109.00 133.00 180.00 190.00 205.00 229.00 276.00 287.00 327.00 370.00 380.00 406.00 421.00 441.00"/>
---
>         <route cost="274.43" savings="0.00" edges="-51 45 -3 5 222 240 254 278 652 662 833 1454 1586 2427" exitTimes="109.00 133.00 180.00 190.00 205.00 229.00 276.00 287.00 327.00 370.00 380.00 405.00 421.00 441.00"/>
53,54c53,54
<     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="450.00">
<         <route cost="265.60" savings="0.00" edges="-1617 -1575 -1338 -493 -264 -250 -232 -222 -5 9 39 47 -47" exitTimes="157.00 174.00 186.00 218.00 270.00 288.00 319.00 339.00 346.00 405.00 416.00 433.00 450.00"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="451.00">
>         <route cost="265.60" savings="0.00" edges="-1617 -1575 -1338 -493 -264 -250 -232 -222 -5 9 39 47 -47" exitTimes="157.00 174.00 186.00 218.00 270.00 288.00 319.00 339.00 347.00 405.00 416.00 433.00 451.00"/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

2 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in output ----------
5c5
< Simulation ended at time: 4210.00.
---
> Simulation ended at time: 4209.00.
13c13
<  RouteLength: 3713.90
---
>  RouteLength: 3717.15
15,17c15,17
<  Duration: 405.38
<  WaitingTime: 83.75
<  TimeLoss: 133.90
---
>  Duration: 406.22
>  WaitingTime: 84.41
>  TimeLoss: 134.44
19c19
< DijkstraRouter answered 3502 queries and explored 67.90 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 3504 queries and explored 68.61 edges on average.
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
13c13
<     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="365.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="364.00">
33c33
<     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="397.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="396.00">
53c53
<     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="450.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="451.00">
57,58c57,58
<     <vehicle id="30" depart="120.00" arrival="452.00">
<         <route cost="239.95" savings="0.00" edges="-1329 -36 222 240 254 278 652 662 833 2386 2411 2454"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="62" depart="248.00" arrival="451.00">
>         <route cost="189.08" savings="0.00" edges="-1892 -664 -540 301 493 1338 1575 1617"/>
61,62c61,62
<     <vehicle id="62" depart="248.00" arrival="452.00">
<         <route cost="189.08" savings="0.00" edges="-1892 -664 -540 301 493 1338 1575 1617"/>
---
>     <vehicle id="30" depart="120.00" arrival="452.00">
>         <route cost="239.95" savings="0.00" edges="-1329 -36 222 240 254 278 652 662 833 2386 2411 2454"/>
73c73
<     <vehicle id="1" depart="4.00" arrival="469.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="1" depart="4.00" arrival="468.00">
80a81,84
>     <vehicle id="9" depart="36.00" arrival="483.00">
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

devices rerouting reroute_congestions period_120 ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting reroute_congestions period_vType ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting reroute_congestions thresholdConstant_10 ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
5c5
< Simulation ended at time: 4210.00.
---
> Simulation ended at time: 4193.00.
13,19c13,19
<  RouteLength: 3713.90
<  Speed: 9.31
<  Duration: 405.38
<  WaitingTime: 83.75
<  TimeLoss: 133.90
<  DepartDelay: 0.06
< DijkstraRouter answered 3502 queries and explored 67.90 edges on average.
---
>  RouteLength: 3710.93
>  Speed: 9.26
>  Duration: 406.95
>  WaitingTime: 85.33
>  TimeLoss: 135.64
>  DepartDelay: 0.09
> DijkstraRouter answered 3515 queries and explored 68.31 edges on average.
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
9c9
<     <vehicle id="13" depart="52.00" arrival="360.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="13" depart="52.00" arrival="361.00">
13c13
<     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="365.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="364.00">
17c17
<     <vehicle id="2" depart="8.00" arrival="370.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="2" depart="8.00" arrival="369.00">
33c33
<     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="397.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="396.00">
45c45
<     <vehicle id="11" depart="44.00" arrival="425.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="11" depart="44.00" arrival="426.00">
53c53
<     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="450.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="451.00">
81,85c81,82
<     <vehicle id="36" depart="144.00" arrival="486.00">
<         <routeDistribution>
<             <route cost="227.43" savings="0.00" replacedOnEdge="-2403" replacedOnIndex="3" reason="device.rerouting" replacedAtTime="264.00" probability="0" edges="-1887 1941 -2436 -2403 -1466 -1329 55 -47 51 330"/>
<             <route cost="169.39" savings="2.55" edges="-1887 1941 -2436 -2403 -1466 -1458 937 -792 330"/>
<         </routeDistribution>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting reroute_congestions thresholdFactor_1.1 ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
5c5
< Simulation ended at time: 4210.00.
---
> Simulation ended at time: 4193.00.
13,19c13,19
<  RouteLength: 3713.90
<  Speed: 9.31
<  Duration: 405.38
<  WaitingTime: 83.75
<  TimeLoss: 133.90
<  DepartDelay: 0.06
< DijkstraRouter answered 3502 queries and explored 67.90 edges on average.
---
>  RouteLength: 3709.99
>  Speed: 9.29
>  Duration: 406.16
>  WaitingTime: 85.06
>  TimeLoss: 134.91
>  DepartDelay: 0.08
> DijkstraRouter answered 3513 queries and explored 68.31 edges on average.
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
9c9
<     <vehicle id="13" depart="52.00" arrival="360.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="13" depart="52.00" arrival="361.00">
13c13
<     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="365.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="16" depart="64.00" arrival="364.00">
17c17
<     <vehicle id="2" depart="8.00" arrival="370.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="2" depart="8.00" arrival="369.00">
33c33
<     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="397.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="396.00">
45c45
<     <vehicle id="11" depart="44.00" arrival="425.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="11" depart="44.00" arrival="426.00">
53c53
<     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="450.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="31" depart="124.00" arrival="451.00">
81,85c81,82
<     <vehicle id="36" depart="144.00" arrival="486.00">
<         <routeDistribution>
<             <route cost="227.43" savings="0.00" replacedOnEdge="-2403" replacedOnIndex="3" reason="device.rerouting" replacedAtTime="264.00" probability="0" edges="-1887 1941 -2436 -2403 -1466 -1329 55 -47 51 330"/>
<             <route cost="169.39" savings="2.55" edges="-1887 1941 -2436 -2403 -1466 -1458 937 -792 330"/>
<         </routeDistribution>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

6 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,2
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long'
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26

devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_internalLanes ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_stop ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_writeGeo ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_writeJunctions ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting via trips_taz ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_taz ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,3
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long'
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : extended rerouter closingLaneReroute closingLane_all ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
17c17
<  WaitingTime: 49.47
---
>  WaitingTime: 49.63

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : extended rerouter closingLaneReroute closingLane_with_rerouting ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
16,18c16,18
<  Duration: 78.12
<  WaitingTime: 23.05
<  TimeLoss: 47.39
---
>  Duration: 78.17
>  WaitingTime: 23.07
>  TimeLoss: 47.44

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : extended rerouter parking congestion_alternatives ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
6c6
< Simulation ended at time: 699.00.
---
> Simulation ended at time: 695.00.
14c14
<  RouteLength: 729.99
---
>  RouteLength: 726.38
16,18c16,18
<  Duration: 380.08
<  WaitingTime: 45.80
<  TimeLoss: 109.59
---
>  Duration: 377.52
>  WaitingTime: 42.40
>  TimeLoss: 105.99
20,26c20
< DijkstraRouter answered 398 queries and explored 3.99 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 318 queries and explored 3.00 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 246 queries and explored 3.33 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 174 queries and explored 3.67 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 1112 queries and explored 3.52 edges on average.

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : extended rerouter parking parkingSearch knowledge_1 ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
18,32c18
< DijkstraRouter answered 90 queries and explored 16.00 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 32 queries and explored 20.38 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 12 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 24 queries and explored 19.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 16 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 22 queries and explored 25.36 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 2 queries and explored 22.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 8 queries and explored 28.00 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 206 queries and explored 19.77 edges on average.

Detailed information for the tests that had known bugs:

TEST had known bugs (see #10246) on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting single_edge ( Last six runs Nov2025 )

consistent handling of unreachable arrivalPos
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching 'Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1c1,3
< Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route. No connection between edge 'beg' and edge 'end'.
---
> Warning: No connection between edge 'end' and edge 'end' found.
> Warning: No route for vehicle '2' found.
> Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route.
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
5,8d4
<     <vehicle id="1" depart="0.00" arrival="23.00">
<         <route edges="beg"/>
<     </vehicle>
<

2 TESTS had known bugs (see #3404) on ts-sim-build-ba :

consider via
(This bug was triggered by FAILING to find text in file 'vehroutes' matching 'route edges=.*A1toA2')
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
5c5
<     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="64.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="45.00">
7,8c7,8
<             <route replacedOnEdge="" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/>
<             <route edges="A0toB0 B0toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/>
---
>             <route replacedOnEdge="" reason="device.rerouting" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/>
>             <route edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toD2 D2toD3"/>

devices rerouting via route ( Last six runs Nov2025 )
devices rerouting via route_embedded ( Last six runs Nov2025 )