27Aug2025 - detailed test results for SUMO.astar

To reconnect the TextTest GUI to these results, run:

texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/texttesttmp/extra_clangD.01Sep110409.3296642 -g

To start TextTest for these tests, run:

texttest -a sumo -d /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/tests


astar: 365 tests: 345 succeeded 17 FAILED 3 known bugs

Detailed information for the tests that FAILED:

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting junctionTaz viaJunctions ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,4
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long'
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26 
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 + -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'SUMOTime' (aka 'long long')
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:23 

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_astar ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645406==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5c3a515deec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x5c3a530efa49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x5c3a51f06239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7f8670c4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_ch ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645413==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5ddf7c13dec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x5ddf7dc4ea49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x5ddf7ca65239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7dbe5564c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_disconnected ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
4a5,15
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645430==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5f9051194ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x5f9052ca5a49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x5f9051abc239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7b2463e4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_flow ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645404==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5dcde9b30ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x5dcdeb641a49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x5dcdea458239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7f28dc44c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel parallel_random_weights ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645452==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x64282de45ec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x64282f956a49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x64282e76d239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7c17d1e4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel public_walk ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,11
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645441==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x622ca222aec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x622ca3d3ba49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x622ca2b52239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7f74dea4c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting parallel taz_astar_landmark_parallel ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,12
> 
> =================================================================
> ==3645418==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> 
> Direct leak of 10080 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x5abd7fdeeec1 in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/bin/sumoD+0x3451ec1) (BuildId: 8cd133af458a7b9fd3aece6d5f2517d99d671bfc)
>     #1 0x5abd818ffa49 in MSRoutingEngine::InitTask::run(MFXWorkerThread*) /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/devices/MSRoutingEngine.cpp:739:20
>     #2 0x5abd80716239 in MFXWorkerThread::run() /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/utils/foxtools/MFXWorkerThread.h:351:24
>     #3 0x7af72d64c712 in FX::FXThread::execute(void*) (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFOX-1.6.so.0+0x24c712) (BuildId: 8255c25c86a9650f625055b6ddbe324d5ad52682)
> 
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 10080 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
---------- New result in exitcode ----------
1

6 TESTS FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba :

---------- Differences in errors ----------
0a1,2
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long'
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26 
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_internalLanes ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_stop ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_writeGeo ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )
devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_writeJunctions ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )
devices rerouting via trips_taz ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting trips_geo geoTrips_junctions_taz ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in errors ----------
1a2,3
> /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26: runtime error: -nan is outside the range of representable values of type 'long long'
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /home/delphi/extraClangDebug/sumo/src/microsim/MSBaseVehicle.cpp:388:26 

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : extended rerouter parking congestion_alternatives ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
20,26c20
< DijkstraRouter answered 398 queries and explored 3.99 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 318 queries and explored 3.00 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 246 queries and explored 3.33 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 174 queries and explored 3.67 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 1136 queries and explored 3.52 edges on average.

TEST FAILED on ts-sim-build-ba : extended rerouter parking parkingSearch knowledge_1 ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
18,32c18
< DijkstraRouter answered 90 queries and explored 16.00 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 32 queries and explored 20.38 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 12 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 24 queries and explored 19.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 16 queries and explored 24.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 22 queries and explored 25.36 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 2 queries and explored 22.50 edges on average.
< DijkstraRouter spent (TIME) answering queries ((TIME) on average).
< DijkstraRouter answered 8 queries and explored 28.00 edges on average.
---
> DijkstraRouter answered 206 queries and explored 19.77 edges on average.

Detailed information for the tests that had known bugs:

TEST had known bugs (see #10246) on ts-sim-build-ba : devices rerouting single_edge ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )

consistent handling of unreachable arrivalPos
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching 'Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1c1,3
< Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route. No connection between edge 'beg' and edge 'end'.
---
> Warning: No connection between edge 'end' and edge 'end' found.
> Warning: No route for vehicle '2' found.
> Error: Vehicle '2' has no valid route.
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
5,8d4
<     <vehicle id="1" depart="0.00" arrival="23.00">
<         <route edges="beg"/>
<     </vehicle>
< 

2 TESTS had known bugs (see #3404) on ts-sim-build-ba :

consider via
(This bug was triggered by FAILING to find text in file 'vehroutes' matching 'route edges=.*A1toA2')
---------- Differences in vehroutes ----------
5c5
<     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="64.00">
---
>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0.00" arrival="45.00">
7,8c7,8
<             <route replacedOnEdge="" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/>
<             <route edges="A0toB0 B0toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/>
---
>             <route replacedOnEdge="" reason="device.rerouting" replacedAtTime="0.00" probability="0" edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toC1 C1toB1 B1toA1 A1toA2 A2toB2 B2toC2 C2toD2 D2toD3"/>
>             <route edges="A0toB0 B0toC0 C0toD0 D0toD1 D1toD2 D2toD3"/>
devices rerouting via route ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )
devices rerouting via route_embedded ( Last six runs Sep2025 Aug2025 )