21Mar16r20261 - detailed test results for COMPLEX

To reconnect the TextTest GUI to these results, run:

texttest -a complex -d /home/delphi/sumo/tests -reconnect /home/delphi/texttesttmp/gcc4_64.31Mar021245.12919 -g

To start TextTest for these tests, run:

texttest -a complex -d /home/delphi/sumo/tests


default: 92 tests: 77 succeeded 10 known bugs 5 FAILED

Detailed information for the tests that FAILED:

TEST FAILED on sim-build : emissions nefz_hbefa2 ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
14,19c14,19
< CO:13650.8
< CO2:6.61059e+006
< HC:4606.3
< NOx:66375.9
< PMx:1883.96
< fuel:2635.54
---
> CO:13642.8
> CO2:6.60941e+06
> HC:4602.6
> NOx:66359.9
> PMx:1882.78
> fuel:2635.07
24,29c24,29
< CO:27731.6
< CO2:1.079e+007
< HC:9002.29
< NOx:134199
< PMx:5044.41
< fuel:4301.82
---
> CO:27713.8
> CO2:1.07879e+07
> HC:8993.89
> NOx:134182
> PMx:5041.24
> fuel:4300.98
34,39c34,39
< CO:19604.5
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in results ----------
2d1
< 0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0
1185d1183
< 0;0;0;0;8.03811;1179.23;3.70155;1.18368;15.9351;0.47014
2368d2365
< 0;0;0;0;17.7817;2092.33;8.40151;3.17588;17.1109;0.83418
3551d3547
< 0;0;0;0;8.10369;1216.48;4.45559;1.09689;24.8754;0.443809
4734d4729
< 0;0;0;0;6.80449;1063.82;3.2899;0.886134;15.57;0.424128
5917d5911
< 0;0;0;0;6.6038;1035.42;3.97099;0.699674;21.621;0.412806
7100d7093
< 0;0;0;0;12.1761;1538.23;4.17785;1.60584;38.5632;0.463526
8283d8275
< 0;0;0;0;16.0396;2495.9;7.3442;2.79772;18.8304;0.995077
9466d9457
< 0;0;0;0;13.8851;2424.01;11.104;4.33659;22.8648;0.756698
10649d10639
< 0;0;0;0;18.0933;1812.03;8.37001;3.32572;16.4497;0.722427
11832d11821
< 0;0;0;0;5.49729;1049.42;2.67729;0.588207;16.2116;0.418387
13015d13003
< 0;0;0;0;4.30021;327.248;1.65919;0.688628;8.74508;0.130469
14198d14185
< 0;0;0;0;14.678;1677.08;6.0371;2.92107;15.784;0.668627
15381d15367
< 0;0;0;0;15.9864;2318.42;7.4579;2.77714;15.8664;0.924318
16564d16549
< 0;0;0;0;7.24994;1095.83;3.83666;0.576818;21.6621;0.436892
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on sim-build : emissions nefz_hbefa3 ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
14,16c14,16
< CO:165856
< CO2:2.97448e+006
< HC:10458.7
---
> CO:165589
> CO2:2.97248e+06
> HC:10442.1
18,19c18,19
< PMx:1170.76
< fuel:1271.9
---
> PMx:1169.18
> fuel:1271.04
24,26c24,26
< CO:354999
< CO2:3.46308e+006
< HC:19534.4
---
> CO:354733
> CO2:3.46018e+06
> HC:19511.9
28,29c28,29
< PMx:350.971
< fuel:1488.41
---
> PMx:350.626
> fuel:1487.16
34,39c34,39
< CO:409500
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>
---------- Differences in results ----------
2d1
< 0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0
1185d1183
< 0;0;0;0;267.056;1997.78;16.5694;1.58194;0;0.85879
2368d2365
< 0;0;0;0;265.722;2902.78;22.4889;0.345278;0;1.24738
3551d3547
< 0;0;0;0;604.444;1362.78;7.49167;0.254167;5.375;0.585879
4734d4729
< 0;0;0;0;360;1422.78;3.03889;0.552222;1.82611;0.61171
5917d5911
< 0;0;0;0;224.889;1489.72;0.972778;0.204889;0.162944;0.640162
7100d7093
< 0;0;0;0;157.611;1404.44;0.57;0.163667;0.305556;0.603848
8283d8275
< 0;0;0;0;177.722;1287.5;0.624444;0.169361;0.305833;0.553684
9466d9457
< 0;0;0;0;179.194;1228.61;0.641944;0.167472;0.308056;0.528227
10649d10639
< 0;0;0;0;629.444;2323.61;618.333;0;0;0.998802
11832d11821
< 0;0;0;0;1.99694;0;1.3875;4.95;14.9556;0
13015d13003
< 0;0;0;0;1.37722;0;0.791389;4.25;12.5361;0
14198d14185
< 0;0;0;0;0.399167;0;0.350556;1.82778;11.8972;0
15381d15367
< 0;0;0;0;0.538889;1049.72;0.130194;0.431389;9.17222;0.395069
16564d16549
< 0;0;0;0;0.478889;1022.78;0.00993611;0;11.3;0.384769
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST FAILED on sim-build : emissions nefz_phemlight ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
14,19c14,19
< CO:395.568
< CO2:2.21255e+06
< HC:142.775
< NOx:6686.76
< PMx:258.52
< fuel:840.186
---
> CO:395.501
> CO2:2.21204e+06
> HC:142.736
> NOx:6685.1
> PMx:258.476
> fuel:839.993
24,29c24,29
< CO:4494.76
< CO2:2.22376e+06
< HC:77.7537
< NOx:639.034
< PMx:14.9752
< fuel:951.422
---
> CO:4494.32
> CO2:2.22308e+06
> HC:77.7354
> NOx:638.97
> PMx:14.975
> fuel:951.13
---------- Differences in results ----------
2d1
< 0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0
1185d1183
< 0;0;0;0;0.0670538;506.58;0.0390689;0.0449138;1.65426;0.192367
2368d2365
< 0;0;0;0;0.437978;681.905;0.0182787;0.000153639;0.0642102;0.291749

TEST FAILED on sim-build : sumo emission ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
10,14c10,14
< CO2:490581
< HC:85.9055
< NOx:778.381
< PMx:28.6001
< fuel:195.587
---
> CO2:487220
> HC:85.3171
> NOx:773.05
> PMx:28.4042
> fuel:194.247

TEST FAILED on sim-build : traci pythonApi multiconnect ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

---------- Differences in output ----------
1,2c1,2
< Loading configuration... done.
< Loading configuration... done.
---
> Loading configuration... Loading configuration... done.
> done.

Detailed information for the tests that had known bugs:

TEST had known bugs (bug 1691 (new)) on sim-build : netconvert dlr-navteq_roundtrip ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

******************************************************
Ticket #1691 (new defect: )
edge shapes at junctions get lost on matsim reimport
http://sumo.dlr.de/trac.wsgi/ticket/1691
Reported By: behrisch Owned by: 
Priority: major Milestone: 1.0.0
Component: net building (NETGEN, NETCONVERT) Version: SVN
Description:
matsim always include the node into the edge shape and thus a reimport does not give the same result. The same issue exists for dlr-navteq #1687
******************************************************
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'net' matching '.*')
---------- Differences in net ----------
4c4
< <net version="0.13" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
---
> <net version="0.25" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
6c6
<     <location netOffset="-399345.66,-5809365.64" convBoundary="-1.31,0.00,1737.68,767.39" origBoundary="13.519602,52.425528,13.545248,52.434465" projParameter="+proj=utm +zone=33 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs"/>
---
>     <location netOffset="-399345.50,-5809365.91" convBoundary="0.00,0.00,1737.97,767.05" origBoundary="1351960.000000,5242553.000000,1354525.000000,5243232.000000" projParameter="+proj=utm +zone=33 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs"/>
9c9
<         <lane id=":175648134_0_0" index="0" allow="bicycle" speed="5.56" length="4.82" shape="15.90,169.70 14.56,169.04 14.04,168.28 14.35,167.40 15.46,166.42"/>
---
>         <lane id=":175648134_0_0" index="0" allow="bicycle" speed="5.56" length="4.82" shape="16.24,169.26 14.91,168.61 14.39,167.84 14.69,166.97 15.81,165.99"/>
12,13c12,13
<         <lane id=":261599791_0_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.60,181.48 34.67,181.47"/>
<         <lane id=":261599791_0_1" index="1" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.18,178.21 34.20,178.20"/>
---
>         <lane id=":261599791_0_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.51,181.07 34.56,181.07"/>
>         <lane id=":261599791_0_1" index="1" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.09,177.80 34.11,177.80"/>
16c16
<         <lane id=":261599791_2_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="34.18,178.21 32.85,177.55 32.33,176.78"/>
---
>         <lane id=":261599791_2_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="34.09,177.80 32.76,177.14 32.25,176.37"/>
19c19
<         <lane id=":261599791_6_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="32.33,176.78 32.64,175.91 33.76,174.93"/>
---
>         <lane id=":261599791_6_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="32.25,176.37 32.55,175.50 33.68,174.53"/>
22,23c22,23
<         <lane id=":261599791_3_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="33.34,171.66 33.34,171.66"/>
<         <lane id=":261599791_3_1" index="1" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="33.75,174.93 33.76,174.93"/>
---
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (bug 1691 (new)) on sim-build : netconvert matsim_roundtrip ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

******************************************************
Ticket #1691 (new defect: )
edge shapes at junctions get lost on matsim reimport
http://sumo.dlr.de/trac.wsgi/ticket/1691
Reported By: behrisch Owned by: 
Priority: major Milestone: 1.0.0
Component: net building (NETGEN, NETCONVERT) Version: SVN
Description:
matsim always include the node into the edge shape and thus a reimport does not give the same result. The same issue exists for dlr-navteq #1687
******************************************************
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'net' matching '.*')
---------- Differences in net ----------
4c4
< <net version="0.13" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
---
> <net version="0.25" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
6c6
<     <location netOffset="-399345.66,-5809365.64" convBoundary="-1.31,0.00,1737.68,767.39" origBoundary="13.519602,52.425528,13.545248,52.434465" projParameter="+proj=utm +zone=33 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs"/>
---
>     <location netOffset="0.00,-19.68" convBoundary="0.00,0.00,1737.68,747.71" origBoundary="0.00,19.68,1737.68,767.39" projParameter="!"/>
9c9
<         <lane id=":175648134_0_0" index="0" allow="bicycle" speed="5.56" length="4.82" shape="15.90,169.70 14.56,169.04 14.04,168.28 14.35,167.40 15.46,166.42"/>
---
>         <lane id=":175648134_0_0" index="0" speed="5.56" length="4.82" shape="15.90,150.02 14.56,149.36 14.04,148.60 14.35,147.72 15.46,146.74"/>
12,13c12,13
<         <lane id=":261599791_0_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.60,181.48 34.67,181.47"/>
<         <lane id=":261599791_0_1" index="1" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.18,178.21 34.20,178.20"/>
---
>         <lane id=":261599791_0_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.58,161.80 34.67,161.79"/>
>         <lane id=":261599791_0_1" index="1" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="34.17,158.53 34.20,158.52"/>
16c16
<         <lane id=":261599791_2_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="34.18,178.21 32.85,177.55 32.33,176.78"/>
---
>         <lane id=":261599791_2_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="34.17,158.53 32.84,157.87 32.33,157.10"/>
19c19
<         <lane id=":261599791_6_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="32.33,176.78 32.64,175.91 33.76,174.93"/>
---
>         <lane id=":261599791_6_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="2.41" shape="32.33,157.10 32.63,156.23 33.76,155.25"/>
22,23c22,23
<         <lane id=":261599791_3_0" index="0" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="33.34,171.66 33.34,171.66"/>
<         <lane id=":261599791_3_1" index="1" speed="27.78" length="0.10" shape="33.75,174.93 33.76,174.93"/>
---
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (bug 1691 (new)) on sim-build : netconvert opendrive_roundtrip ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

******************************************************
Ticket #1691 (new defect: )
edge shapes at junctions get lost on matsim reimport
http://sumo.dlr.de/trac.wsgi/ticket/1691
Reported By: behrisch Owned by: 
Priority: major Milestone: 1.0.0
Component: net building (NETGEN, NETCONVERT) Version: SVN
Description:
matsim always include the node into the edge shape and thus a reimport does not give the same result. The same issue exists for dlr-navteq #1687
******************************************************
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'net' matching '.*')
---------- Differences in net ----------
4c4
< <net version="0.13" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
---
> <net version="0.25" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
6c6
<     <location netOffset="0.09,0.05" convBoundary="0.00,0.00,1737.79,766.31" origBoundary="-0.55,-0.05,1737.80,766.26" projParameter="!"/>
---
>     <location netOffset="0.02,0.05" convBoundary="0.00,0.00,1737.72,766.31" origBoundary="-0.02,-0.05,1737.70,766.26" projParameter="!"/>
18c18
<         <lane id=":1_0_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="4.97" width="3.20" shape="471.21,49.64 471.94,48.30 472.75,47.80 473.64,48.15 474.59,49.35"/>
---
>         <lane id=":1_0_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="4.97" width="3.20" shape="471.10,49.20 471.83,47.85 472.64,47.36 473.53,47.71 474.48,48.90"/>
21c21
<         <lane id=":10_0_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="11.21" width="3.20" shape="377.73,472.70 375.62,470.39 374.73,467.83 373.73,465.54 371.26,464.06"/>
---
>         <lane id=":10_0_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="11.21" width="3.20" shape="377.66,472.70 375.55,470.39 374.66,467.83 373.65,465.54 371.19,464.06"/>
24c24
<         <lane id=":10_1_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="34.28" width="3.20" shape="377.73,472.70 367.63,465.58 364.94,461.62 369.66,460.82 381.79,463.18"/>
---
>         <lane id=":10_1_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="34.28" width="3.20" shape="377.66,472.70 367.56,465.58 364.87,461.62 369.59,460.82 381.72,463.18"/>
27c27
<         <lane id=":10_2_0" index="0" allow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="4.97" width="3.20" shape="377.73,472.70 377.10,471.30 377.20,470.35 378.01,469.86 379.54,469.82"/>
---
>         <lane id=":10_2_0" index="0" allow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="4.97" width="3.20" shape="377.66,472.70 377.03,471.30 377.13,470.35 377.94,469.86 379.47,469.82"/>
30c30
<         <lane id=":10_3_0" index="0" allow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="12.04" width="3.20" shape="380.97,466.48 376.71,465.65 375.05,465.93 375.99,467.32 379.54,469.82"/>
---
>         <lane id=":10_3_0" index="0" allow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="12.04" width="3.20" shape="380.89,466.48 376.63,465.65 374.98,465.93 375.92,467.32 379.47,469.82"/>
33c33
<         <lane id=":10_4_0" index="0" disallow="pedestrian" speed="13.90" length="10.00" width="3.20" shape="380.97,466.48 371.26,464.06"/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #1265) on sim-build : netconvert osm_roundtrip ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

information about node membership in a joined TLS is lost
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'errors' matching '-    <node id="283018817".*tl="joinedS_0"/>')
---------- Differences in errors ----------
1,2c1,6
< Warning: Discarding unusable type "railway.construction" (first occurence for edge "11390634#0").
< Warning: Discarding unusable type "highway.construction" (first occurence for edge "24154002").
---
> Warning: Discarding unusable type 'waterway.riverbank' (first occurence for edge '4616435#0').
> Warning: Discarding unusable type 'waterway.canal' (first occurence for edge '5363708').
> Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.opposite_track' in type 'cycleway.opposite_track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '7216737#0').
> Warning: Discarding unusable type 'railway.construction' (first occurence for edge '11390634#0').
> Warning: Discarding unusable type 'highway.construction' (first occurence for edge '24154002').
> Warning: Discarding unknown compound 'cycleway.track' in type 'cycleway.track|highway.primary' (first occurence for edge '24214693#0').
6,7d9
< Warning: Ambiguity in turnarounds computation at node '283018845'.
< Warning: Ambiguity in turnarounds computation at node 'cluster_283018844_283018932'.
12,16c14,119
< Warning: The traffic light 'joinedG_2' does not control any links; it will not be build.
< Warning: Could not build program '0' for traffic light 'joinedG_2'
< Warning: The traffic light 'joinedG_3' does not control any links; it will not be build.
< Warning: Could not build program '0' for traffic light 'joinedG_3'
< Warning: Ambiguity in turnarounds computation at node '283018845'.
---
> --- 
> +++ 
> @@ -1,39 +1,5 @@
>  <net version="0.25" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://sumo.dlr.de/xsd/net_file.xsd">
>  
> -
> -    <type id="highway.bridleway" priority="1" numLanes="1" speed="2.78" allow="pedestrian" oneway="1" width="2.00"/>
> -    <type id="highway.bus_guideway" priority="1" numLanes="1" speed="8.33" allow="bus" oneway="1"/>
> -    <type id="highway.cycleway" priority="1" numLanes="1" speed="5.56" allow="bicycle" oneway="0" width="1.00"/>
> -    <type id="highway.footway" priority="1" numLanes="1" speed="8.33" allow="pedestrian" oneway="1" width="2.00"/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #1229) on sim-build : state plain ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

to many tls events
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'tls_state' matching '<tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>')
---------- Differences in tls_state ----------
5a6,55
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
>     <tlsState time="50.00" id="0/0" programID="0" phase="2" state="GrGg"/>
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #254) on sim-build : sumo output one_vehicle ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

different outputs from detectors which should detect the same
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'output' matching '[10')
---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,96
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.9, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (0.0, 51.0) [-1.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (0.0, 51.0) [-1.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (71.0, 71.1) [-1.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.9, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (71.0, 72.0) [-1.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #254) on sim-build : sumo output teleport_multihop ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

different outputs from detectors which should detect the same
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'output' matching '[10')
---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,96
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['2/1to1/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['2/1to1/1_0', '1/1to0/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #254) on sim-build : sumo output two_same_vehicles ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

different outputs from detectors which should detect the same
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'output' matching '[10')
---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,96
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 0.1) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 51.0) [10.0, 10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (75.1, 75.2) [-1.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 0.1) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #254) on sim-build : sumo output two_vehicles_diff_length ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

different outputs from detectors which should detect the same
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'output' matching '[10')
---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,96
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 0.1) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 51.0) [10.0, 10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (75.1, 75.2) [-1.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 0.1) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (76.0, 77.0) [-1.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> success ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] ['3/1to2/1_0']
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>

TEST had known bugs (see #254) on sim-build : sumo output two_vehicles_diff_speed ( Last six runs Mar2016 )

different outputs from detectors which should detect the same
(This bug was triggered by text found in file 'output' matching '[10')
---------- Differences in output ----------
0a1,96
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (38.4, 38.5) [9.5, 9.5, 9.6, 9.6]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 0.1) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (38.0, 39.0) [9.62, 9.5, 9.64, 9.64]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (30.0, 40.0) [9.86, 9.5, 9.86, 9.86]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [9.67, -1.0, 9.67, 9.67]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (0.0, 51.0) [10.0, 9.62, 9.5, 9.62, 9.62]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '51'] 3/1to2/1_0 (0.0, 51.0) [10.0, 9.62, 9.5, 9.62, 9.62]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (38.4, 38.5) [9.5, 9.5, 9.6, 9.6]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 0.1) [10.0, -1.0, -1.0, -1.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (38.0, 39.0) [9.62, 9.5, 9.64, 9.64]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 1.0) [10.0, -1.0, 10.0, 10.0]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 3/1to2/1_0 (30.0, 40.0) [9.86, 9.5, 9.86, 9.86]
> Loading configuration... done.
> failed ['--step-length', '.1', '--end', '100'] 4/1to3/1_0 (0.0, 10.0) [9.67, -1.0, 9.67, 9.67]
> Loading configuration... done.
<truncated after showing first 30 lines>